Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Arguments last week before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in two cases brought by military prisoners at Guant�namo Bay took an unexpected turn that visibly surprised courtroom observers. Government lawyer Gregory Katsas took to the podium on Sept. 8 with confidence — after all, Judge A. Raymond Randolph wrote the court’s July 2005 opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, which upheld the president’s authority to try suspected terrorists before military commissions. But Randolph, joined by panel member Judge David Sentelle, who in a 2003 decision affirmed the government’s authority to keep secret basic information concerning hundreds of foreigners detained after the Sept. 11 attacks, rigorously grilled Katsas. Randolph in particular scrutinized Katsas’ assertion that the court should defer to determinations about the detainees made by military panels convened at Guant�namo Bay, telling the lawyer: “Nothing in the statute requires deference to a military tribunal.” Randolph probed the possibility that Guant�namo Bay detainees have a right under the federal habeas corpus statute to have the facts of their cases considered by a federal court. A day later, in another detainee case, a federal appeals court gave the Bush administration a firm win. The president has the power to detain Jose Padilla, a U.S. citizen who has been held in a South Carolina military brig for more than three years, without charges as a suspected enemy combatant, Judge J. Michael Luttig wrote for a panel of three judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit.
Vanessa Blum can be contacted at [email protected]. Lily Henning can be contacted at [email protected].

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.