The plain language of the contract provides for the removal of personal items from the property, and the evidence shows unequivocally that this was done. Accordingly, the evidence is legally and factually sufficient to support the jury's finding that the appellant had no excuse for his failure to close on the sale.
September 05, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
General Counsel Conference addresses trends in regulatory, data protection, tech management, legal operations, and leadership.
The New York Law Journal honors attorneys and judges who have made a remarkable difference in the legal profession in New York.
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
We are seeking a lawyer with a minimum of four years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowned C...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
Shipman & Goodwin LLP is seeking two associates to expand our national commercial real estate lending practice. Candidates should have ...
Riker Danzig deeply mourns the passing of our esteemed partner, dear friend and beloved colleague, Marc D'Angiolillo.
