Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is likely to approve a measure late this month expanding what companies may say to investors during the 30-day “quiet period” before an initial public offering, people close to the agency said. The SEC could vote on the issue as late as June 29, one day before Chairman William Donaldson is to step down. The SEC voted, 5-0, on Oct. 26 to propose new quiet-period rules that allow executives to provide basic information about their businesses and management philosophies in media interviews or on their Web sites. Under current rules, many agree, it’s unclear what issuers may say during this period. The new rules would update 1930s-era regulations. “When you have so much information on the Internet generally available already, it makes sense to allow more communications,” said Ven Palmer, a securities attorney in Bingham McCutchen’s San Francisco office. Regulators have been very careful about allowing companies to say much during the quiet period, fearing that whatever they say might mislead investors in some way. But even with more communications freedom, companies will remain liable for fraudulent quiet-period statements, according to the draft proposed in October. Shareholders or the SEC could sue a company that makes bad-faith claims or provides inaccurate historical data about itself. The agency could also delay an IPO if it feels the issuer is not providing balanced information. “Well-known, seasoned” companies-those that have market capitalization of at least $700 million and have been public for more than a year-would have more latitude than smaller concerns in what they can disclose during the quiet period before secondary or follow-up offerings. Large companies could advertise stock offerings on television, provided that they take legal responsibility for any commercials and file relevant information about the ads with the agency. The rule changes arose after Google Inc.’s highly anticipated $1.7 billion IPO was nearly spoiled last year by confusion stemming from an interview with the company’s founders published in Playboy magazine. SEC spokesman John Heine declined to comment on the proposal or when it might be adopted. “Generally, we announce the meetings for these things one week in advance,” he said.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.