Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday sent a lifeboat to local lawyers arguing that a luxury cruise line must accommodate disabled passengers. A suit filed by Oakland’s Disability Rights Advocates was kept afloat by a high court opinion in a similar case that said that the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to foreign-registered cruise ships. “The victory is that the Supreme Court held that the ADA applies, so we’re operating within the framework of the ADA,” said Kevin Knestrick, a DRA lawyer representing plaintiff Dorene Giacopini. The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals stayed a dismissal of Giacopini v. Crystal Cruise Line, 04-1089, until an outcome to the Supreme Court case was determined. The opinion in Spector v. Norwegian Cruise Line, 05 C.D.O.S. 4739, is vague enough that it leaves considerable water in the bilge of DRA’s argument that cruise ships must make physical accommodations for the disabled. How the ADA applies to foreign-flagged ships is unclear, said Knestrick and Walter Johnson, the Nixon Peabody partner representing Crystal Cruises, whose ships are registered in the Bahamas. While the Supreme Court ruling says cruise lines’ policies may not discriminate, Johnson said, it is ambiguous on whether ships need to make physical accommodations. “The problem for Crystal, and I think most cruise lines, is structural changes,” he said. In a complaint filed in the Northern District of California last year, Giacopini says what she remembered best about her “Alaskan Memories” cruise was wheelchair-unfriendly corridors, wholly inaccessible decks and a nasty fall incurred when she attempted to negotiate an area where the crew had removed a ramp. Giacopini said she had complained about the ramp’s absence the previous day. The lack of accessibility, Giacopini argued, violates federal law. U.S. District Judge Maxine Chesney disagreed. She marooned the case in June 2004, citing the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals decision in the Norwegian Cruise Lines case — which said the ADA does not cover foreign-flagged ships — in dismissing it. Knestrick appealed that decision, and the Ninth Circuit stayed the case, awaiting the Supreme Court decision. He and Johnson said they expect the Ninth Circuit to remand the case to the trial court. Johnson added that he wasn’t disappointed by the Supreme Court’s ruling since he may still argue that the ADA doesn’t require ships to make structural changes. “We’re perfectly happy with the decision, really,” he said. This isn’t the first such suit for Giacopini. The wheelchair user was also represented by DRA in a 1995 class action against Enterprise Rent-A-Car. She argued that wheelchair users were forced to pay more than non-wheelchair users. The case settled in 2002.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.