Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Click here for the full text of this decision FACTS:T.R.G. was adjudged to be mentally ill and in need of treatment for no longer than 325 days. T.R.G. filed what appears to be a pro se notice of appeal. HOLDING:Appeal abated. The court cites State v. Best Interest and Protection of Ortiz, 640 S.W.2d 67 (Tex.App. Amarillo 1982, no writ), which held that someone who is adjudicated to be mentally ill via a state petition may have an attorney ad litem appointed for them for appeal. Because the record does not show that T.R.G. was appointed an attorney ad litem, the court abates the appeal and remands for a determination of whether such an appointment has been made. If none has, the court directs the trial court to appoint an attorney ad litem, and supplement the clerk’s record accordingly. OPINION:Per curiam; Quinn, Reavis and Campbell, JJ.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.