Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Click here for the full text of this decision FACTS:Ricardo Rangel died from cardiac arrest shortly after undergoing surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome. Rangel’s mother sued Dr. Miguel Samonte Jr., the anesthesiologist on Rangel’s surgery, for medical malpractice. The mother filed a report prepared by Dr. “George Mychaskiw II. DO, Professor and Clinical Director, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Mississippi School of Medicine.” The report did not include Mychaskiw’s curriculum vitae, nor did it discuss his training, experience or his qualifications for rendering an opinion on the standard of care. It does not state whether Mychaskiw has ever worked or is currently working in the anesthesiology field. Samonte moved to dismiss the mother’s claim based on the inadequacy of the report under the Medical Liability and Insurance Improvement Act. The trial court denied Samonte’s motion, finding that the mother had made a good-faith effort to comply with the statute because the report “provides for a first summary of the report.” Samonte now files for a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to dismiss the lawsuit. HOLDING:Writ conditionally granted. The court notes that the Legislature has made clear that the requirements for a report filed under the MLIIA must be strictly complied with. The court finds that there is not a curriculum vitae in the appellate record, even though the trial court said that one was filed. The court agrees that a copy of the curriculum vitae of the expert must be provided as an attachment to the report and notes that the document should appear in the appellate record but does not. Consequently, Mychaskiw’s qualifications must be ascertained within the four corners of the report. The report does not contain any information to describe Mychaskiw’s qualifications. The report is not on letterhead, it is not signed, and it is not even dated. There is no discussion of Mychaskiw’s training or experience or explanation of why he’s qualified to render an expert opinion. “From the four corners of the report, we find no basis for a conclusion that Mychaskiw’s training or experience qualify him to offer an expert opinion on the standard of care for the use of anesthesia during a surgical procedure. That being the case, the report is not an expert report within the requirements of [MLIIA] Section 13.01.” As Samonte has no other adequate remedy at law, mandamus relief is appropriate. OPINION:Richard Barajas, C.J.; Barajas, C.J., McClure and Chew, JJ.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.