Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Your views illustrate why only practicing professionals should dare to comment upon the mechanics of jury selection [" The Cure for the Common Quatman," April 1]. While you might safely attempt a lucid comment on matters of general policy, your work at a legal periodical clearly gives you no insight into trial practice. As you receive a deluge of abuse from trial lawyers, you might come to realize that the “increase” in hung juries that you gloss over, with the concomitant expense to all of us, would be enormous. Worse, it would end up denying swift (and therefore all) justice to many litigants. It would particularly harm the little guys who cannot afford the war of attrition that is the staple of civil practice. On the criminal side, your proposals are simply Procrustean. You would dispense with unanimous juries to ameliorate the effects of banning peremptory challenges. That is nothing less than a proposal that we scrap that cornerstone of the United States Constitution called “reasonable doubt” and replace it with the concept of “close enough.” If some of the jurors (by definition, reasonable members of our society) believe the accused to be innocent, how can it possibly be said that his guilt has been proved “beyond any reasonable doubt?!” Yet your proposal would implement such a system, destroying the last, best safeguard of human freedom known to law. On the bright side, you clearly have a bright future in party politics, the expected source of simplistic and ill-considered “solutions” that might play well to an uninformed audience. Kenneth M. Quigley San Francisco

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.