While the expert did assert that gasoline siphoned from the return fuel line at the rear of the car, the only support he offered for this opinion was that he had eliminated all other possibilities. He eliminated the obvious possibility that fuel or vapors from the tank filler neck ignited only by saying so, offering no other basis for his opinion. Such a bare opinion was not enough.
April 18, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
Fox Rothschild LLP has an opening in the Princeton, NJ office for an associate in the Labor & Employment Department. The ideal candidate...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. LEGAL PRACTICE ASSISTANT – MARYLAND OFFICE: Regional law firm with multiple offices seeks a legal practice assistan...
A Tampa-based fund management company specializing in complex litigation claims and other legal and regulatory risks is seeking a Senio...
MARTIN, CLEARWATER & BELL LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW IN MEMORY OF FRANCIS PETER BENSEL
GILL & CHAMAS Congratulations to our partner and friend,DAVID H. LANDE, ESQ on his appointment to Judge in the Division of Workers Compensation.
