The state failed to elicit any testimony pertinent to ascertaining what facts would allow the officer to objectively determine the defendant was violating a traffic law, in support of his judgment. Even viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court's ruling, the record did not support a finding of reasonable suspicion.
March 21, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
One of New Jersey's well regarded, a Chambers ranked Real Estate law firm, is seeking a Land Use Transactional Partner with $500,000+ in por...
Lazor Rantas, PC, a boutique family law firm located on Main Street in Chatham, New Jersey seeks an associate with 2-5 years family law expe...
Position available for an experienced insurance defense litigator with a full or partial book of business to join a long-established insuran...
MARTIN, CLEARWATER & BELL LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW IN MEMORY OF FRANCIS PETER BENSEL
GILL & CHAMAS Congratulations to our partner and friend,DAVID H. LANDE, ESQ on his appointment to Judge in the Division of Workers Compensation.
