The defamation claim does not fall within the scope of arbitrable claims as a violation of common law"affecting economic terms of employment,as nothing asserted in the claim touched on issues generally regarded as economic terms of employment. Because the employee's defamation claim did not fall within the scope of the 2000 Rules of Arbitration, the trial court abused its discretion by denying the motion to compel arbitration.
March 21, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Legal professionals from In-House, Private Practice and the Bar work together to overcome challenges facing dispute resolution.
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
This role requires providing paralegal support and assistance to attorneys in the management, coordination, and administration of all aspect...
PERMANENT/FULL-TIME: Come join a thriving company in the Maryland suburbs of Washington, DC! The company's l...
Our client, a large privately held health care system, is seeking a Deputy General Counsel to support its large physician group. Candidate m...
MARTIN, CLEARWATER & BELL LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW IN MEMORY OF FRANCIS PETER BENSEL
GILL & CHAMAS Congratulations to our partner and friend,DAVID H. LANDE, ESQ on his appointment to Judge in the Division of Workers Compensation.
