Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Justice Acosta http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=57264 THE BOARD of Education (BOE) sought to vacate an arbitration award issued in favor of the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), holding that BOE violated their collective bargaining agreement by coverage of full-time classes during preparation periods. Rather than serving UFT, however, BOE mistakenly served the New York State United Teachers, an organization in the same building, and thus failed to serve UFT within the requisite time period. BOE argued for an extension of time for service pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules 306-b, which allows for such extensions upon good cause or in the interests of justice. The court explained that this standard allowed it to consider any relevant factor. Finding it was not “faced with the dismissal of a viable claim,” it declined to exercise its discretion and grant BOE an extension. Because BOE failed to show the arbitrator’s award violated strong public policy, its request for extension was denied.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.