Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
To show entitlement to mandamus relief, ETMC was required to demonstrate that 1. the trial court had a legal duty to act; 2, ETMC requested performance; and 3. the trial court refused to perform. The appellate court concludes that ETMC did not establish a request for performance based upon the new affidavits. Because it did not make the necessary request, ETMC has been unable to establish the trial court's refusal to act on such a request.
March 07, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS