This case and Ross differ in that the trial court granted Ross's motion without making specific findings of fact, while this trial court granted the defendant's motion and made specific findings of fact. Those findings permitted the court of appeals to review the ruling without infringing on the trial court's discretion to determine the facts.
February 28, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
GlobeSt. Women of Influence Conference celebrates the women who drive the commercial real estate industry forward.
We are a nationally recognized personal injury law firm focused solely on representing victims of sexual abuse located in Los Angeles. We ...
Growth opportunity with New York insurance defense firm based in New York City which is growing its Fairfield County, Connecticut practice a...
Westchester County, NY. Attorney seeking to semi-retire seeks an attorney to takeover a law firm specializing in healthcare litigation again...
MARTIN, CLEARWATER & BELL LLP COUNSELORS AT LAW IN MEMORY OF FRANCIS PETER BENSEL
GILL & CHAMAS Congratulations to our partner and friend,DAVID H. LANDE, ESQ on his appointment to Judge in the Division of Workers Compensation.
