Keller, P.J., dissents. "[W]e should not address the issue of the absence of findings because it was not raised at trial, was not raised on direct appeal, was not addressed by the court of appeals, and was not raised in this Court. It should be an exceedingly rare occurrence for this Court to address on discretionary review an issue that has not been raised at any level in the judicial system. In my opinion, this is not one of those occurrences."
February 28, 2005 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
We are seeking a lawyer with a minimum of five years of experience in transactional work to join our well-established, nationally renowned C...
We are seeking a lawyer with extensive transactional intellectual property experience to join our corporate practice. Candidates should hav...
0-5 year associate attorney needed for a civil litigation firm in the Buckheadarea. Great opportunity for advancement. Salary will be commen...
Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & daCosta would like to announce that...
COLE SCHOTZ P.C. WELCOME HONORABLE GARRY S. ROTHSTADT, J.A.D. (RET.)
GREENBAUM ROWE SMITH & DAVIS LLP would like to announce that...
