X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
I find it surprising that, as reported in your article [" Court says $10K 'side bet' can't settle e-retailer fight," Feb. 16], L.L. Bean’s attorney would argue that the Ninth Circuit “could still sort out court jurisdiction in connection with Internet disputes” with another case recently accepted for en bancreview, Yahoo v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L’Antisemitisme.The two cases are quite different. The Yahoo case, in its U.S. incarnation, did not involve the question of a U.S. court’s jurisdiction over a non-forum resident based on that party’s Internet activities. Instead, it involved the question of whether a U.S. court had jurisdiction over two alien defendants whose sole connection to this forum was that they had successfully vindicated their legal rights arising under the law of their home forum (France) against a resident of this forum (Yahoo). Yahoo v. LICRA is not an Internet jurisdiction case at all, inasmuch as it did not arise out of any Internet activity on the part of the defendant. The case did initially arise, however, out of Internet activity — Yahoo’s. And interestingly, the question of the jurisdictional implications of that activity has already been addressed — by the French tribunal, which found that Yahoo was subject to jurisdiction in Francewhen its Internet content viewable inFrance violated French law. In one of the great paradoxes of the case, a U.S. courtwould have to expand our traditional notions of personal jurisdiction overforeign defendantsin order to limit what some may perceive as an undue expansionof the French court’s jurisdiction over Internet activity. Richard Jones San Francisco Editor’s note:Richard Jones, now with Covington& Burling, was formerly with Coudert Brothers and represented the French groups in the Yahoo case in trial court and at the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.