Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
SAN JOSE — A federal judge has referred a former public defender to the U.S. attorney’s office and the California State Bar for an investigation of the attorney’s alleged role in a scheme to prey on homeowners close to losing their property. U.S. District Judge William Alsup issued the ruling Wednesday in a case involving Thomas Spielbauer, who worked in the Santa Clara County public defender’s office for more than two decades and made three unsuccessful runs for judge. According to the ruling, plaintiffs Scott Heineman and Kurt Johnson used the Internet to seek out homeowners behind on mortgage payments. The order says that, for a $3,000 fee, the pair would offer to “eliminate” the homeowner’s mortgage. The pair would then execute a complicated series of transactions that actually would leave “the borrower in worse condition than when he or she first looked to the plaintiffs for debt relief,” Alsup said. As counsel to Heineman and Johnson, Spielbauer brought frivolous lawsuits against banks involved in the loans in an attempt to win settlements. The suits claimed the banks could not collect the debts because the loans had been paid for with wire transfers, not cash. “The court here has seen the scam at work,” Alsup said. “Greater bad faith would be hard to imagine. Plaintiffs and their counsel have employed a smokescreen to burden various lending institutions and impose upon them litigation costs in hopes of extracting settlements.” Spielbauer and his clients were ordered to pay about $77,000 to attorneys for the defendants. Spielbauer was fired from the public defender’s office in July 2003 after being charged with the misdemeanor of deceiving a superior court judge. Barry Hovis of San Francisco’s Musick, Peeler & Garrett, who represented defendant World Savings Bank in the case before Alsup, said he wrote to Spielbauer when he first heard of the claims and characterized them as “preposterous.” He said he received a reply from Spielbauer claiming he “was willing to run the risk.” “He paid the price for it,” Hovis said. Spielbauer denied wrongdoing. “I would never compromise my integrity,” he said Friday afternoon. “I respect Judge Alsup, but I disagree with his ruling and I will appeal.” It appears from the order that Spielbauer had almost avoided taking a big hit. According to the order, Alsup had earlier decided not to refer Spielbauer to the State Bar when he paid a $10,000 sanction and agreed to dismiss the outstanding loan suits. But he then moved to withdraw as counsel in five of the suits, drawing more complaints from defense attorneys. Alsup responded with last week’s order.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.