Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Survival for biotech companies like Agensys Inc. often boils down to two factors: intellectual property and cash. In 2002 Alan Mendelson ensured that Agensys had enough of the latter. The Latham & Watkins corporate partner helped put together a private placement that brought in $42 million. And Agensys’ IP portfolio was strong enough to attract the attention of biotech giant Genentech Inc. Two years before the funding came in, Agensys had signed a $30 million licensing deal with Genentech — a signal that its technology was desirable and well protected. Indeed, Agensys’ future looked bright. But then the Genentech deal tanked. Losing Genentech “caused anxiety internally and in the investor group,” says Mendelson. Fortunately, the money Mendelson brought in more than balanced out the lost revenue from the deal. And more patents were on the way, thanks to the work of Kate Murashige, an IP partner in Morrison & Foerster’s San Diego office. Together Murashige and Mendelson — along with the company’s promising cancer research, of course — helped ensure that Agensys, unlike so many other startup biotechs, would have a second act. After the Genentech deal went south, Agensys scientists carried on with their cancer research and Murashige kept drafting patent applications. Last summer the curtain lifted on act two: Agensys signed a new licensing deal with Genentech, this one valued at $90 million. Connecting with Mendelson — who serves as the company’s corporate counsel and corporate secretary — was essential to Agensys’ growth and development, says Donald Rice, the company’s president and chief executive, who refers to the attorney as “one of the giants in the field.” Rice is equally appreciative of Murashige’s patent work, which turned out to be a key element in the new deal with Genentech. A partner in Latham’s office in Menlo Park, California, Mendelson likes to characterize himself as a Johnny Appleseed for small companies. With an expertise as a general corporate lawyer and a focus on biotech, Mendelson represents about 10 public and 20 private life sciences companies. These include Amgen Inc., now the country’s largest biotechnology company, Eidogen Inc., Perlegen Sciences Inc., Valentis Inc. and Guava Technologies Inc. Mendelson also is the general partner of Axiom Venture Partners, a venture capital firm that funds a variety of high-tech startups, and often acts as underwriter’s counsel in biotech deals. Mendelson first met the scientists who founded Agensys in late 1996, when he received a call from Barry Scheher, a friend who worked in finance at Amgen. Scheher was also working with UCLA Ventures, an organization developed through the university’s business school to focus on commercializing UCLA scientists’ inventions. Scheher introduced Mendelson to this group as well as to some urological cancer researchers at UCLA Medical Center. “They were eight UCLA scientists who thought they had something unique,” says Mendelson. But the scientists were complete beginners when it came to business enterprises, he adds. At the time, Mendelson was a partner at Palo Alto’s Cooley Godward. He led a group of Cooley lawyers in helping the UCLA scientists form Agensys. Some of the company’s initial investors were former patients of the founding researchers and, Mendelson says, “believed in whatever these guys did because they’d done such a good job with them.” The company’s original name, Urogenesys Inc., emphasized its focus on prostate cancer. Mendelson helped the new company develop its business strategy, assisting in decisions about licensing and possible deal partners, according to Latham partner Charles Hoyng, who drafted the second Agensys/Genentech transaction. Mendelson performed similar functions for Amgen in the early days of that company, which is headquartered in Thousand Oaks, California. Mendelson wound up taking a leave from Cooley to act as Amgen’s general counsel for a year in the early 1990s. Morrison & Foerster, meanwhile, came to represent Agensys through Timothy Lithgow, the company’s senior director for IP who had previously worked at MoFo and knew Murashige. Lithgow oversaw Murashige’s handling of the patent portfolio until he left Agensys for a job at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories in early 2004. Like Mendelson, Murashige focuses on early-stage companies. According to the Patent and Trademark Office’s Web site, Murashige is listed as the attorney on nearly 350 biotech patents. The patents she’s prosecuted for Agensys have not yet issued, but she says that she’s applied for more than 40 families of two or three patents each. Agensys, she says, is a “major client.” The first deal with Genentech, which involved its licensing of Agensys’ prostate-cancer technology, was signed in 2000. Two years later, however, Genentech decided not to continue with prostate cancer research, and the company backed out of the agreement. Meanwhile, Agensys had also changed its focus, broadening its research interests to cover a wider range of tumors. Mendelson, who left Cooley in 2000, acknowledges that it “hurt some perceptions in the market” when Genentech pulled out of the deal. But he says Agensys “acted responsibly and kept up the contacts with Genentech.” Scientists from both companies spoke at large cancer research meetings. And Mendelson continued with his networking activities. According to Hoyng, Mendelson kept Agensys officials informed “about things happening in the community to companies of similar size and capabilities.” Ultimately, Genentech’s scientists concluded that Agensys occupied significant IP real estate in a technology area they wanted to enter. This new technology dealt with cancer targets — sites on the surface of cancer cells — and monoclonal antibodies that attack those sites, zeroing in on them like a guided missile. Genentech’s scientists set the second deal with Agensys into motion, bringing in Genentech’s in-house business development team. Initially, Genentech officials did not think Agensys would be able to get patents for the proteins in which they were interested. “They were telling me that in their experience, the allowances wouldn’t be issued,” says Murashige. But the MoFo lawyer was tenacious and spent a great deal of time at the patent office, working on winning approval for Agensys’ patent applications. About four months before the deal was inked, Murashige received notice that the patent applications had been accepted, which clearly helped to accelerate the new licensing arrangement. Mendelson wasn’t involved in deal negotiations or license drafting. “Once the ball started rolling on the transaction, Alan played a counselor’s role in a global sense to the company,” says Hoyng. Drafting the license instead fell to Hoyng, who has a Ph.D. in organic chemistry and who specializes in IP transactional work. A former in-house scientist at Genentech, Hoyng heads Latham’s licensing practice and has been working with Mendelson since arriving at the firm in 2001. Because the agreement with Genentech covered some technology for which patents had not yet fully issued, one of Hoyng’s most important tasks was defining, in contract language, precisely what the term “patent rights” encompasses. Biotech patent prosecution can take years, and very often licensees make a leap of faith that the patents will issue, says Hoyng. David Kuiper, of counsel at Latham’s office in Costa Mesa, California, did much of the face-to face negotiating with Genentech’s lawyers and business development officials. Murashige and other MoFo lawyers did some patent analysis in the deal, along with Shane Popp, Agensys’ sole in-house patent counsel. Since Agensys already had a thorough understanding of the technology, the bulk of the IP analysis fell to Genentech. Daniel Hung, Genentech’s patent counsel, read patents and researched scientific literature to look for prior art. According to Hoyng, due diligence in such transactions, particularly those in which unissued patents are being licensed, often involves signing a confidentiality agreement and then reading documents that trace the prosecution history of those patents. Under the terms of the contract, Genentech gains worldwide rights to two Agensys cancer targets and monoclonal antibodies specific to those targets. If Genentech develops any cancer treatments or diagnostic products using the technology, Agensys receives a share of the profits. Agensys is keeping the rights to some diagnostic and vaccine uses. As part of the deal, Genentech took a small, undisclosed equity in Agensys. But Genentech typically is not looking to buy out smaller companies, says Anna Hall, Genentech’s senior business development director who negotiated the financial side of the transaction. Officials at Agensys claim that the agreement with Genentech is potentially worth $90 million, which may or may not prove realistic. Agensys, after all, will recover that amount of money only if Genentech winds up developing several products that utilize Agensys technology. In any case, payments in biotech deals tend to be weighted toward the back end, when it looks like an actual product will emerge, says Gregory Wade, a research analyst at San Francisco’s Pacific Growth Equities. Even so, Agensys has more than just this deal to fall back on. While the transaction with Genentech is the company’s biggest deal, Rice says that Agensys hopes in the future to commercialize some of its other technology itself. “Many drug-development companies have taken it on the chin in recent years because they’re one-trick ponies,” says Stephen Bent, who heads the life sciences practice in the Washington, D.C., office of Milwaukee’s Foley & Lardner. “Their prospects are so ephemeral or risky. But it sounds like Agensys is doing the sort of thing a successful drug-discovery company has to do, keeping at least three balls in the air.” Victoria Slind-Flor is the West Coast editor for IP Law & Business magazine, which is affiliated with IP magazine.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.