X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
SAN JOSE — Deputy District Attorney James Shore has been re-elected president of the Santa Clara County Government Attorneys Association, ending more than a month of infighting in the DA’s office regarding the decision to pursue the Measure C ballot initiative this fall. Shore defeated challenger Mike Fletcher 157-128. Three other incumbents will represent the GAA in 2005: Vice President Paul Colin, Secretary Ann Huntley and Treasurer David Soares, all deputy district attorneys. Colin defeated challenger JoAnne McCracken 155-127; Huntley defeated challenger Charles “Chuck” Gillingham 162-121; and Soares defeated Stephen Lowney 160-122. Shore thanked his supporters Monday and said he was grateful his fellow attorneys “showed confidence in my abilities.” “It’s time to join ranks again and get back to business,” Shore said. “I think the union members know that — however they voted — I will be extremely hard-working and dedicated to their cause.” Shore said his priorities in his fifth year as GAA president will include working to ensure “fairness is part of the equation” when negotiating contracts for county attorneys. But the veteran prosecutor hinted that the union will work to improve ties with the Board of Supervisors and the county counsel’s office, which were strained during the Measure C fight. “There’s definitely going to be some effort put into repairing relationships,” Shore said, adding that the GAA is already working toward that goal. The race for GAA leadership is not normally contentious or even publicized, but the union’s decision to push a ballot initiative that would have required binding arbitration in workplace disputes virtually ensured that this year would be different. The fight over Measure C was often ugly, with the county at one point accusing its lawyers of greed and charging that they wanted pay hikes at the expense of other county workers. Some attorneys had said that Shore’s unyielding approach to union business and rancorous relationship with the county should be abandoned in favor of leaders better able to work with the Board of Supervisors and County Counsel Ann Ravel for improved pay and benefits. Shore has been mentioned as one of several potential DA candidates in 2006 if George Kennedy bows out. Prior to the Measure C loss, Shore’s leadership was generally lauded. In October 2001, he helped negotiate a new contract that tied salaries to attorney pay in the public and private sector throughout Silicon Valley. That resulted in a 15 percent increase in 2002. One prosecutor who asked to be anonymous credited Shore with helping Santa Clara lawyers become among the best paid prosecutors in California. In a recent interview with The Recorder, Shore claimed that Measure C had wide union support and said the union backed the proposal to “inject fairness into a process riddled with animosity and litigation.” Challenger McCracken said the results, tallied up late Friday, showed how divided the legal community was regarding Measure C. She added that the incumbents probably got a boost from lawyers who thought removing them would give county supervisors the impression that attorneys were unwilling to fight for better salaries. “We’re disappointed because we felt we would be better representatives, but we’re dedicated to supporting the union,” McCracken said.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.