Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Congress finally passed a federal courts budget, and the worst did not come to pass, court officials say. But many details are unresolved, and Northern District administrators are still waiting to find out what the new numbers mean for them. “I think it’s too early to tell, but it could have been worse,” said Claudette Silvera, Northern District chief pretrial services officer. “If you’re expecting the worst, and it comes out a little better, then you’re OK.” The worst would have been a so-called “hard freeze.” The 2004 budget expired at the beginning of October, and administrators were worried that Congress wouldn’t pass a new budget until the beginning of the next congressional session in January. That would have forced courts to freeze expenditures at 2004 levels. Because several expenses, such as rent, automatically increase each year, courts would have been forced to make cuts in other areas to cover those mandatory costs. Now legislators have approved $5.42 billion for the federal judiciary, instead of the $5.7 billion courts had asked for. In the largest portion of the budget, salaries and expenses, the courts had wanted a 5.6 percent increase over 2004 levels. Instead, they got a 4.3 percent bump. The difference will prevent courts from growing to accommodate higher caseloads, but will not mean more layoffs, according to a news release from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Northern District Clerk Richard Wieking called the 2005 budget “the most positive we could get [between] two bad outcomes.” In a statement released by his chambers, Chief Judge Vaughn Walker said Congress’s passing a budget was “a big help” but warned that things are still tight. The budget for the Northern District clerk’s office was $10.7 million in 2004. Although administrators in Washington, D.C., are still working out how to allocate the money approved by Congress, Wieking is expecting about $9.9 million. He hopes to find out by next week. “I am optimistic that we will not have to cut drastically,” Wieking said. “I know that the court values its employees and feels that we’ve already cut very deeply.” In the last year, budget cutbacks forced federal courts to cut their workforce by 6 percent. Locally, that translated into eight layoffs and six more unfilled positions within the clerk’s office, as well as belt-tightening at pretrial services, probation and the federal defender’s office.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.