Featured Firms
Presented by BigVoodoo
The state's repetition of the name of the offense was not harmful because: 1. the jury would have known ofthe nature of the offense even if the trial court had accepted the stipulation and prevented mention at any stage except the indictment; 2. the character conformity inference of the prior conviction was not particularly strong; 3. the conviction itself was for one of the less serious offenses subject to the registration statute; and 4. the evidence supporting the conviction was substantial.
October 18, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS