When Paul Gilbertson's surveying license was revoked, he appealed the revocation to the Oregon Court of Appeals and simultaneously filed a suit in federal court seeking money damages from the members of the board for violations of his constitutional rights. Gilbertson's case gave the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals the opportunity to clarify what it admitted were its "mixed signals" about when and how federal courts should abstain from hearing a case when there is a parallel state proceeding.
September 13, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
The County of Dallas, founded in 1846, is the second most populous county in Texas with a vibrant and diverse population of nearly three mil...
THE CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, FL INVITES YOUR INTEREST FOR THE POSITION OF CITY ATTORNEYWelcome to the City of Fort Lauderdale. Click on the ...
McCarter & English, LLP seeks an associate for an in-person position in McCarter s Washington DC office. McCarter s energy transactiona...