X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Yahoo! Inc.’s attempt to protect itself against a French court’s order forbidding auctions of Nazi memorabilia failed last week in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A divided panel ruled that U.S. courts do not have jurisdiction over two organizations that successfully sued Yahoo in French court, winning sanctions and thousands in fines. Yahoo v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L’Antisemitisme, No. 04 C.D.O.S. 7742. It is against French law to sell or possess Nazi memorabilia. Two groups-La Ligue Contre Le Racisme et L’Antisemitisme and L’Union Des Etudiants Juifs de France-filed suit against Yahoo in 2000, arguing that the well-known Internet portal facilitates transactions and discussions of the offending materials. A diverse crowd-including the American Civil Liberties Union, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Internet companies-were watching the case because it deals with untrodden legal ground involving Internet commerce and the collision of different countries’ courts. No collection effort One of the key issues is that the French groups have never tried to collect on their judgment. Instead, Yahoo filed a pre-emptive lawsuit against the groups and prevailed in San Jose, Calif., in front of U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel, who granted Yahoo’s summary judgment request, and said the French judgment conflicts with the First Amendment. But 9th Circuit senior judges Warren Ferguson and A. Wallace Tashima didn’t even reach that constitutional issue. Instead, they stopped their analysis after deciding that the French groups’ actions didn’t rise to a level that would allow U.S. courts to get involved. The appellate judges hang their hat on reasoning that the French groups haven’t yet done anything to harm Yahoo. “Yahoo obtains commercial advantage from the fact that users located in France are able to access its Web site . . . .Yahoo cannot expect both to benefit from the fact that its content may be viewed around the world and to be shielded from the resulting costs,” Ferguson wrote for the majority. “If Yahoo violates the speech laws of another nation, it must wait for the foreign litigants to come to the United States to enforce the judgment before its First Amendment claim may be heard by a U.S. court.” Senior Judge Melvin Brunetti dissented, writing that “although wrongful conduct will satisfy the Supreme Court’s constitutional standard for the exercise of [personal] jurisdiction, it is not necessarily required in all cases; indeed, I believe that the Supreme Court’s ‘express aiming’ test may be met by a defendant’s intentional targeting of his actions at the plaintiff in the forum state.” Brunetti agreed with Fogel that the French groups took actions in California that put them under federal court jurisdiction. They sent a cease-and-desist letter to Yahoo, used the U.S. Marshals Service to serve process and asked the French court to order the Internet company to do something that could only be done at its California headquarters. That the groups failed to enforce the judgment against Yahoo is “immaterial” because the Internet portal is still suffering injury, according to Brunetti. Robert Vanderet, a partner in O’Melveny & Myers’ Los Angeles office who argued the case on behalf of Yahoo, said he was disappointed but not crushed because the decision was based only on the procedural issue of jurisdiction.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.