Appellant complains that the trial court erred by conducting the adjudication and disposition hearings without a qualified sign language interpreter for N.v., the juvenile's hearing-impaired mother, who attended both hearings. Assuming without deciding that the constitution would require appointment of interpreter, the court is unable to determine that a constitutional violation has occurred.
August 23, 2004 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Presented by BigVoodoo
Legal professionals from In-House, Private Practice and the Bar work together to overcome challenges facing dispute resolution.
This conference brings together the industry's most influential & knowledgeable real estate executives from the net lease sector.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania with their dedication to law.
Bartko Zankel Bunzel & Miller is seeking an attorney with at least three years of experience in labor and employment law to join its diverse...
Bartko Zankel Bunzel & Miller is seeking an attorney with at least seven years of experience in labor and employment law to join its diverse...
New York insurance defense firm with offices in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York City, and Western New York, is growing its Stamford/Hartf...
Bennett, Tina mourns the loss of Elizabeth (Libby) Bennett, Esq.
BLOCK O'TOOLE & MURPHY is pleased to announce the addition of three new associate attorneys to our team.
