Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
After years of belt-tightening, corporate legal departments are beginning to show signs of expansion, at least in the technology sector. Much of the new hiring involves licensing attorneys who handle the intellectual property transactions that are a mainstay of Silicon Valley’s technology companies. The trend underscores the extent to which businesses are dedicating their in-house legal resources to revenue-generating activities. The demand for licensing attorneys also reflects an improving economic climate. Deals that call for licensing know-how are becoming more common. Licensing attorneys are so closely entwined with deal flow that many companies keep their attorney staffing figures close to the vest for fear of telegraphing their strategy and sales forecasts to business competitors. According to legal recruiters who work with in-house legal departments, though, demand for licensing attorneys is definitely on the rise. Julie Brush, co-founder of Solutus Legal Search, says she was recently conducting up to eight searches for in-house licensing attorneys. That compares to only two such searches that she was involved with a year or so ago. And those, she says, were “soft” searches, meaning that the companies proceeded very slowly. “There was no pressing need to get somebody on board,” says Brush. Now it appears the need is there. For example, Applied Biosystems Group, headquartered in Foster City, California, hired an attorney to fill a newly created technology transactions position last year. Instead of relying on its in-house patent attorneys to pitch in on licensing matters the way the company had traditionally done, Paul Grossman, the company’s vice president of intellectual property, decided that the work required a specialist. For technology companies, the licensing of intellectual property is bread-and-butter legal work. Most prefer to handle the work in-house because of the repetitive nature of the transactions and the intimate knowledge of the business that’s required. “Licensing is clearly better done inside,” says Marcia Sterling, general counsel of Autodesk Inc., a software company in San Rafael, California. “It’s very hard to get an outsider close enough to a particular business unit to really understand.” Sterling recently hired a part-time attorney whose duties will include licensing, among other things. “We were just a little light. We’ve got a lot going on right now,” says Sterling. “And folks were working too hard.” Software vendors in particular rely on licensing attorneys since every sale is essentially an outbound licensing deal that requires lawyer involvement. As a result, licensing attorneys play an indispensable role in the company’s core business. “When revenues and sales pick up, the first thing that a company wants is a licensing lawyer because they need to service those revenue deals,” says Heather Meeker, a partner at Greenberg Traurig’s office in East Palo Alto. Unlike general corporate work, says Meeker, “the amount of [licensing] capacity that a company needs is directly related to the amount of sales they’re doing.” Licensing attorneys also play a big role in strategic deals, entering into joint ventures with other businesses and incorporating technology from other companies into their own products. Thus far, the industry’s hiring of licensing attorneys appears to be more of a gradual buildup than an arms race. Corporate legal departments tend to hire attorneys one-by-one rather than bringing on groups of people as law firms often do. And budgets for in-house legal departments are typically set at the beginning of a company’s fiscal year, allowing for less flexibility when it comes to hiring staff in response to sudden changes in deal flow. For many companies, a wait-and-see approach is the safest route. Until a business determines that an increase in licensing work is a normal business condition rather than a one-time surge, it’s easier and less risky to offload surplus licensing work to outside counsel. Still, the outlook within many corporate legal departments is upbeat. Says Sterling, “I would say that it’s predictable that as the economy picks up, you’ll see corporate legal departments expand.” Alexei Oreskovic is a reporter at The Recorder who writes about corporate law departments and other matters.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.