X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The numbers just don’t jibe with the controversy. For the third year in a row, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals�for many, the black-robed embodiment of crazy West Coast liberalism�fared about the same as other circuits when it came to getting reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court. But as the circuit moves toward shaking its reputation for being out of step with courts in the rest of the country, a new trend appears on the rise. “The most striking fact is not the reversal rate, but the number of cases accepted,” said Arthur Hellman, a University of Pittsburgh School of Law professor. Appeals from the 9th Circuit accounted for about one-third of the Supreme Court’s docket in the term that ended on June 29: 25 of 78 cases. Hellman said about one-sixth of petitions for certiorari were from the 9th Circuit, meaning that the Supreme Court is “taking cases from the 9th Circuit at a much higher rate than you would expect.” Although the reversal rate was normal, the term was not without trouble. More than half of the 9th Circuit’s 19 reversals were unanimous. Those include last week’s final case from the circuit, Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, No. 03-339, which deals with the Federal Tort Claims Act and the Alien Tort statute. The 9th Circuit had allowed a man abducted from Mexico to sue the United States for false arrest. Legal scholars offer a handful of explanations for the circuit’s increasing domination of the high court docket, which they noticed a few years ago. One reason may be that the West is a cultural and economic powerhouse, a place where novel legal issues are simply more likely to come up. “If an issue is not happening somewhere on the West Coast, it’s probably not a significant issue,” said Vikram Amar, a University of California Hastings College of the Law professor. The ‘microscope factor’ Besides that, there’s also the microscope factor. “You have to wonder whether the [Supreme Court] law clerks don’t take a special look at 9th cases,” said Hellman, who closely follows the 9th Circuit. It’s like “a self-reinforcing phenomenon because they’ve taken so many in the past that it becomes the focus of attention,” he speculated. Amar pointed out that nearly half of the Supreme Court have personal ties to California and the West: Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Sandra Day O’Connor both attended Stanford Law School and then worked in Arizona. Justice Anthony Kennedy was born in Sacramento, Calif., and sat on the 9th Circuit, and Justice Stephen Breyer was born in San Francisco. Amar said the higher number of reviews could be linked to the flogging the circuit got in years past. “That lack of trust may carry forward even when the basis for it may not be there,” he said. Critics shouldn’t look to the recent session for ammunition to disparage the 9th Circuit. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed or vacated 76% of the 9th Circuit cases it heard this session. Collectively, the circuits were reversed 77% of the time. But comparisons between circuits are difficult when no other circuit comes close to the number of cases under review. The closest was the 6th Circuit, which contributed eight cases. Six were reversed. In last year’s session, the 9th Circuit’s reversal rate was 75%. Over the last three years, it has averaged 74%. In the last five years, the average is 78%, including a 90% rate for the 1999-2000 high court session. Whether the numbers will have any effect on the 9th Circuit’s notoriety remains to be seen. It is still the circuit that took God out of the Pledge of Allegiance and temporarily stopped the California recall election. “The circuit is not going to be able to rid itself of its reputation,” said court watcher Thomas Goldstein of Goldstein & Howe in Washington. “It has been tarred and feathered as being liberal in the extreme. The most it can hope for is being liberal in moderation.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.