X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The darker side of gun control What supreme irony on the Opinion page: “An Infamous Date,” Harry Reicher’s worthy reminder about Nazi laws against Jews, juxtaposed with “Reasonable Regulation,” Amitai Etzioni’s diatribe against the Second Amendment [NLJ, April 5]. Ironic, because Nazi laws against Jews denied them any right to keep and bear arms. After the Nazis took power in 1933, they immediately made use of two laws passed by the liberal Weimar Republic: a law authorizing the suspension of civil liberties (the Reichstag fire being the pretext) and the Gun Control Act of 1928. They executed massive search-and-seizure operations for subversive publications and unlicensed firearms, ostensibly to repress “Communists” but in fact to disarm political opponents and Jews. The Weimar law allowed police to deny firearm ownership to any “unreliable” person. Dr. Werner Best, chief legal advisor and second in command in the Gestapo, directed on Dec. 16, 1935, that Gestapo permission must be obtained for issuance to a Jew of a permit to carry a weapon. Hitler signed an amended Gun Control Act in March 1938, broadening exemptions to include Nazi party members and barring Jews from the firearms industry. Just one day before Kristallnacht in November 1938, police announced a campaign “to disarm Berlin’s Jewish population,” claiming to have seized 1,702 unlicensed firearms from Jews. The actual pogrom entailed breaking into Jewish homes on a massive scale (ostensibly to search for weapons) and the torching of synagogues. Victor Klemperer’s diary (quoted by Professor Reicher) describes how Nazis spent hours ransacking his house and smashing furniture with an axe in search of weapons. Finding his sabre left over from the Great War, they hauled him off to the police station. Klemperer was released the same day, but some 20,000 others were not so lucky. They were the ones thrown into concentration camps. SS chief Heinrich Himmler decreed that Jews were forbidden to possess weapons, and violators would be sent to a “concentration camp and imprisoned for a period of up to 20 years.” That was followed by a duly promulgated regulation under the Gun Control Act prohibiting Jews from keeping and bearing arms of any kind. The German Jews were not disarmed to make their homes safer for children or to reduce crime. They were disarmed to prevent any defense against the repression that would later culminate in genocide. Deportations without resistance would characterize the Holocaust. Some favor a world in which all private individuals, not just disfavored groups, are disarmed and only the military and police are armed. The Nazi-occupied countries were a laboratory for this experiment. As Judge Alex Kozinski wrote, dissenting in Silveira v. Lockyer: “The Second Amendment is a doomsday provision, one designed for those exceptionally rare circumstances where all other rights have failed.” Stephen P. Halbrook Fairfax, Va. The writer is the author of That Every Man Be Armed (Greenwood Press 1989). A Federalist comments I am a member of the Student’s Chapter of the Federalist Society at the University of Miami School of Law. I can tell you that Janet Reno doesn’t know what she is talking about. “Law School Turf War Ignites” [by Tresa Baldas, NLJ, April 26], quotes Reno as saying, “I don’t think that [the Federalist Society] reflects the laws that apply to all people. I don’t think that its voice speaks for all the people. Law students want something real. They want to understand how they can participate and what a difference they can make.” The Miami Lawyers Chapter of the Federalist Society invited Janet Reno to speak at their winter meeting. She was to debate former Attorney General Richard Thornburgh (she later cancelled). How can an organization not reflect the laws that apply to all people, when people with many different perspectives on the law are invited and are welcome to speak at our events? It is important to note that the Federalist Society is not only an organization for conservatives, but also for libertarians (some believe the libertarians now outnumber the conservatives among the student chapters). There is nothing more real than what the Federalist Society does for law students. Recently I organized a panel discussion, “Regulation, Private Property Rights and the Environment,” moderated by Judge Frank Shepherd from Florida’s 3d District Court of Appeal. He happens to be a former attorney for the Environmental Protection Agency under the Reagan administration and a former head attorney for the Pacific Legal Foundation in Florida. Professor David Abraham, a liberal professor from the University of Miami, was a panelist. He certainly advocated different theories of the law than Professor Steven Eagle, a conservative property professor from George Mason University. We also included Steve Darmody, an attorney with Shook, Hardy & Bacon who provided a practical perspective. Reno, who has an office at the law school, did not attend the event. Ryan W. Owen Miami

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.