X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.


http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=48534

Justice Ward

DEFENDANT ENTERED a plea agreement providing for dismissal upon completion of a residential drug treatment program. Incarceration would result from her violation of the agreement. After violating agreement, defendant was permitted to enter into a second plea agreement, which called for five to 10 years incarceration if she terminated drug treatment. Prior to sentencing – after violating the second agreement – defendant moved to dismiss the indictment or reduce her sentence in the interest of justice. The court denied defendant’s motion. It found no provision within Criminal Procedure Law §210.40 or other legal authority permitting reduction of sentence in the interests of justice. The court also found that defendant failed to provide support for the court to find the existence of a “compelling factor, consideration or circumstance clearly demonstrating that conviction or prosecution of the defendant . . . would constitute or result in injustice.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.