X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.


http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=48280

Justice Winslow

A FEE DISPUTE led defendant to bring disciplinary proceedings against plaintiff, a fellow attorney, with the grievance committee. The proceedings were dismissed. Plaintiff’s defamation action claimed that defendant, who advised others of having filed complaints with the committee, brought the proceedings to destroy his reputation. In response to defendant’s dismissal motion, he claimed that defendant waived judicial privilege by violating the confidentiality requirements of Judiciary Law §90(10). The court dismissed the bulk of plaintiff’s action, but granted leave to replead defamation. Although it found that defendant did not waive the privilege of protected speech afforded those bringing actions before the grievance committee when she told a third party that such a proceeding was pending against plaintiff, the disclosure of details about the proceeding does waive the privilege, making the disclosures actionable under a defamation claim.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.