Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
In a rare after-hours ruling, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court yesterday refused to stay a Philadelphia judge’s decision to jail attorney Andrea Konow, a public defender, for refusing to continue representing a capital murder defendant after he punched her co-counsel in open court. “Issuing a stay would reward a recalcitrant attorney for flouting her ethical obligations to the court,” Justice Ronald Castille wrote in a five-page statement supporting the court’s one-page per curiam order. “Lawyers, who are officers of the court, should not be encouraged to act petulantly or defiantly when confronted with orders with which they disagree,” Castille wrote in Commonwealth v. El-Shabazz. Castille also said issuing a stay “would reward the capital defendant for his misconduct by providing him with an unwarranted new trial — which may very well be the reason he punched his lawyer in the first place.” Justice Max Baer filed a two-page concurring statement, and Justice Sandra Schultz Newman dissented, but said her statement of dissent would be filed at a later date. For Konow, a 19-year veteran of the Defender Association of Philadelphia, the ruling means that she could be sent back to jail this morning by Common Pleas Judge Jane Cutler Greenspan if she again refuses to resume the defense of Malik El-Shabazz, 20, who is on trial for the rape and murder of a 6-year-old girl. Due to the late release of the ruling, none of the lawyers in the Defender Association could be reached for comment. El-Shabazz punched attorney Fred R. Goodman on Monday, soon after the prosecution had rested its case. On Tuesday morning, Greenspan allowed Goodman to withdraw from the case, but ordered Konow to finish the trial. When Konow insisted that she, too, had to withdraw, Greenspan held her in contempt. Konow was jailed for about six hours on Tuesday but was released that afternoon when the Superior Court granted a temporary stay. On Wednesday morning, a second stay was issued that extended Konow’s reprieve – this time by Newman. For almost two days, the lawyers waited for a ruling, saying they expected Newman to handle the emergency petition on her own. But at about 5:30 p.m. yesterday, the court issued a decision that shows the matter was referred to the entire court and that Newman was the only justice voting in Konow’s favor. Castille was critical of Konow and her lawyer, Bradley S. Bridge, saying they “ignored” the directive in Superior Court Judge Richard Klein’s stay order on Tuesday that instructed them to seek a stay from Greenspan. Failing to ask the trial judge for a stay, Castille said, was “reason enough” to deny Konow’s emergency petition to the Supreme Court, and also “forestalled the possibility of the flexible resolution envisioned by Judge Klein.” Castille said he voted to deny the stay because the Supreme Court should not “tie the hands” of a trial judge. “By tying the judge’s hands, the court would prevent any prospect of rational solution,” Castille wrote. Granting the stay, he said, would “inevitably lead to the declaration of a mistrial.” A stay order would also “turn our review standard on its head,” Castille wrote, because Greenspan’s order is “presumptively valid” and should be reviewed only for an abuse of discretion. Reviewing such an order on an emergency motion for a stay, Castille said, calls for “an extraordinarily high showing.” Since Konow did not provide the high court with a transcript, he said, the court was unable to review Greenspan’s reasoning. “I do not deny that it is a sad prospect to consider any member of the bar spending time incarcerated for contempt,” Castille wrote. “But petitioner [Konow] has always held the keys to her release. The ‘injury’ may be easily repaired by attending to her duties as an officer of the court.” In a two-page statement, Baer said he agreed with Castille’s observations about the practical effect of any stay and that it would effectively “reward the defendant for his own egregious misconduct.” But Baer said he wrote separately because, unlike Castille, he was not as critical of Konow’s motives. “I decline to assume petitioner’s [Konow's] behavior lacks ethicality or represents petulance,” Baer wrote. But Baer said he agreed with Castille’s view that the case was difficult to review without a complete record — a fact that, he said, “strengthens my belief that we should not interfere with the distinguished trial judge orchestrating this difficult legal quagmire.” ( Copies of the one-page order, five-page statement in support of denial and two-page concurring statement in Commonwealth v. El-Shabazz, PICS No. 04-0466, are available from The Legal Intelligencer . Please call the Pennsylvania Instant Case Service at 800-276-PICS to order or for information. Some cases are not available until 1 p.m.)

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.