X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46951 Magistrate Judge Eaton PLAINTIFF, WHO was diagnosed with Delayed Sleep Phase Syndrome, brought an action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the New York City Human Rights Law. A jury returned a special verdict pursuant to which plaintiff was the prevailing party, but where there were some questions decided in defendants’ favor. A magistrate judge had to determine what monetary damages should be awarded for a certain period and whether the court should issue an order of reinstatement, an issue that was not mentioned to the jury. The magistrate judge referred to the jury’s verdict sheet and concluded that plaintiff is entitled to some lump-sum payment for a certain period and to reinstatement for another period. The court suggested that defendant City of New York should reinstate plaintiff for a certain period and that plaintiff work certain hours in the office with mainframe computer programming duties.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.