X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
WASHINGTON — Number of court orders issued to date in United States v. Philip Morris Inc.: 509. Number of pages of documents exchanged in discovery: 40 million. Potential sum at stake: $289 billion. By any measurement, the Justice Department’s suit against the tobacco industry is a mammoth piece of litigation. With a bench trial scheduled to begin in the case Sept. 13 before U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler of the District of Columbia, the challenges posed by the immense size and scope of the case are becoming increasingly evident. For example, government attorneys recently stated their intention to submit 72,525 evidentiary exhibits totaling more than a million pages. Tobacco industry lawyers — who admittedly would prefer a whittled-down list from which they might glean the government’s trial strategy — were quick to point out the impact such a massive filing would have on court proceedings. “It would place an enormous — indeed infeasible — burden on the court to provide even a cursory review of such evidence,” the defendants stated in an emergency motion. “For instance, if the court only gave each page no more than 30 seconds of consideration, it would take approximately 833 10-hour working days to review the paper just once.” In a Feb. 26 pleading, the government defended its lengthy list: “The exhibits designated by the United States are a reflection of the magnitude of the Defendants’ conduct, the complexity of the case, and the number of contested facts.” On March 8, Kessler ordered the government to come back with a trimmed and prioritized exhibit list by May 1. Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller declines comment. The two top DOJ lawyers on the tobacco case did not respond to interview requests. After President Bush won the 2000 presidential election, many observers predicted that the new administration would quietly settle or even drop its controversial case against the tobacco industry. Instead, both sides have proceeded methodically toward trial. According to several lawyers involved in the tobacco litigation, Kessler has taken a hands-on approach to managing the unwieldy case, forcing lawyers to stay on track throughout the lengthy discovery phase. “The judge got involved early on and entered a number of case management orders that set out a schedule for what was going to happen and in what period of time,” says William Ohlemeyer, vice president and associate general counsel of Altria Group Inc., formerly known as Philip Morris Cos. Inc. “This is a case that could have gotten bogged down pretty quickly. Instead, it has proceeded on a very strict schedule that has been designed to make the parties move forward.” Recent rulings and a rigorous pretrial calendar suggest Kessler intends to demand the same intense focus during the trial, which may last more than six months. The first of three scheduled pretrial conferences began this week. Kessler has ordered both sides to file trial outlines and proposed findings of fact before the start of trial and will likely set time limits for each side to present its case in court. She has also provided that witnesses’ direct testimony be presented in a written question-and-answer format, rather than live. A similar approach was used by D.C. federal trial Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in the second phase of the Microsoft Corp. antitrust trial. “As far as court is concerned, written directs save time,” says Altria lawyer Dan Webb, a partner in the Chicago office of Winston & Strawn. “It forces lawyers to perfect direct examination earlier and get it in written form.” Webb serves as co-lead trial counsel for Altria and Philip Morris USA Inc., clients he has represented since 1997. Also on the trial team for the tobacco industry: Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison partner Theodore Wells Jr., representing Altria and Philip Morris USA; Jones Day partners Robert McDermott and Robert Weber for the R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.; Kirkland & Ellis partner David Bernick on behalf of the Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.; and Thompson Coburn partner J. William Newbold representing the Lorillard Tobacco Co. The trial team represents a virtual “Who’s Who” of the country’s biggest products liability litigators. The group’s client roster includes corporate giants Wyeth Inc., Dow Corning Inc., the IBM Corp. and the Exxon Mobil Corp. Aside from Wells, who is best known for his defense of political figures such as former Secretary of Agriculture Michael Espy and former Sen. Robert Toricelli, D-N.J., each has been involved in past tobacco litigation. “It is likely that you will see more lawyers coming in and out of the courtroom than you would with a jury trial, where there is a need to develop a relationship with jurors,” says Jones Day partner Jonathan Redgrave, who coordinates filings from the joint defendants’ legal team. “In a bench trial, the judge has already seen many of the lawyers in court and will also understand why different people examine different witnesses.” In total, the court record refers to more than 140 lawyers from roughly 30 law firms working for the nine defendants. Altria alone has a team of about 50 outside lawyers, primarily from the firms of Arnold & Porter, Hunton & Williams and Winston & Strawn. “It’s a huge project to coordinate,” says Wells of Paul, Weiss. “There’s a lot of e-mail traffic.” DOJ spokesman Miller says the Justice Department has approximately 40 lawyers and support staff working the case. Funding for the lawsuit comes from a variety of sources, including DOJ appropriations, client agencies and health care litigation accounts. Those familiar with the complicated arrangement suggest that the case already has cost the government roughly $100 million. “We certainly understood it was a very large undertaking,” says Zuckerman Spaeder partner William Schultz, who oversaw the DOJ tobacco case early on as deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Division. “When you take on the tobacco industry, it is one of the few times that defendants have significantly more resources than the U.S. government to devote to the case.” DISMISSED CLAIMS The case going to trial — though vast — is substantially narrower than the complaint filed by the DOJ team in September 1999. In June 2000, Kessler dismissed two of the government’s claims that had sought to recover Medicare and Medicaid costs related to smoking. The government’s sole remaining claim alleges that the tobacco industry engaged in an illegal conspiracy to defraud the American public in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, and seeks $289 billion in ill-gotten profits. Though the RICO approach is novel, the underlying issues look much like those confronted by tobacco industry lawyers in numerous lawsuits brought across the country by consumers, state attorneys general and labor unions. In terms of sheer magnitude, however, lawyers for the defense team say the federal lawsuit is unprecedented. “I’ve tried some awful big cases in my career,” says Webb, who previously represented Altria and Philip Morris in lawsuits brought in Florida, Washington state and Texas. “It does not get any more enormous than this.” Webb also served as lead trial counsel for Microsoft before Judge Kollar-Kotelly. At the conclusion of that case, the court docket listed approximately 800 entries. The docket in the tobacco case, still six months from trial, already contains more than 3,000 filings, including more than 500 court orders from Kessler. Special Master Richard Levie, a retired D.C. Superior Court judge, has issued another 150 reports and recommendations on case management issues and discovery disputes since his appointment in December 2000. Overall, 301 depositions totaling more than 2,000 hours have been taken by both sides. Among those deposed by the joint defendants: Clinton-era White House advisers Bruce Lindsay, John Podesta and Elena Kagan, now dean of Harvard Law School. More than 45 expert witnesses are expected to testify at trial, and conservative estimates place the total number of witnesses to be called to testify somewhere above 200. Kessler seems determined to keep the immense case moving toward trial. “The public interest demands that cases of such significance not drag on for years and years and that they come to closure in a time-honored fashion: a public trial where the positions of both sides can be tested in the glare of cross-examination and public scrutiny,” Kessler wrote in a 2002 scheduling order. “It is essential that our civil justice system demonstrate that it has the capacity to efficiently handle a case of this magnitude by narrowing issues, reining in over-zealous lawyers and directing counsel to focus their efforts on the central issues of the case rather than peripheral minutiae.” Vanessa Blum is a reporter with Legal Times, a Recorder affiliate based in Washington, D.C.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.