Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Despite it being “Supreme Court Day” last Thursday at City University of New York School of Law, a visit to Flushing, Queens, by an associate justice of the nation’s high court is not common. So it was that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s campus address not only packed the main auditorium at CUNY Law, but filled two overflow lecture halls with closed-circuit coverage. And Justice Ginsburg, a notoriously doting grandmother, was presented with a bouquet of roses by a dozen of the students’ children. Indeed, the visit was something of a love affair. When Justice Ginsburg spoke, softly and precisely, a pin could be heard to drop, especially in answer to a student’s question on her view of the proper balance between civil liberties and the need for increased security in a time of terrorism. “We have not been given to security procedures to the extent that other countries have,” said Justice Ginsburg. “And you must remember that [the Supreme Court] is a reactive institution.If the people don’t care about protecting their liberties, there is no court that can [address] that sadness.” But Justice Ginsburg’s time at CUNY Law was not entirely spent in carefully worded opinion. In introducing Justice Ginsburg to her faculty and students, most drawn from the city’s outer boroughs and from working-class backgrounds, CUNY Law Dean Kristin Booth Glen remarked, “There are many similarities between Justice Ginsburg and our community. For one, she was born in Brooklyn. She was a twirler. She went to law school with an infant. She is a person who loves the racetrack at Saratoga. She is an incredible opera fan, known to dress in extremely silly costumes of the period.” Justice Ginsburg began her formal talk � about two women of the past who overcame social barriers of their time to play important roles in the history of the Supreme Court � with a bit of self-deprecation. “If I could have any talent that God could give me, I would have been a great diva,” she said. “Being a monotone, I thought [law] would be the next best thing. It’s endlessly challenging, and [associate justice] is a most secure position.” The subjects of Justice Ginsburg’s talk were Malvina Shanklin Harlan, the wife of Justice John M. Harlan (1877-1912), and Burnita Shelton Matthews, the first woman to serve as a federal district judge when she received a recess appointment from President Harry S. Truman in 1949. Ms. Harlan played a pivotal role in one of her husband’s most famous opinions, Justice Ginsburg explained. Justice Harlan dissented when the Supreme Court struck down a Reconstruction-era civil rights law of 1875 prohibiting racial discrimination in restaurants and trains. His wife found from among his collection of court memorabilia the inkwell used in 1857 by Chief Justice Roger Taney to write the infamous Dred Scott decision, confirming the right to hold slaves. As Justice Ginsburg recounted in a National Public Radio interview, “When [Justice Harlan] saw that inkwell and recalled the part that it had played in retaining the shackles of slavery [it] made his thoughts just fly and he wrote, and he soon finished his dissenting opinion. Dissents speak to a future age. So that is the dissenter’s hope: that they are writing not for today, but for tomorrow.” As a frequent dissenter on today’s Supreme Court bench, and a lawyer who suffered gender-based employment discrimination not so long ago, Justice Ginsburg said she felt a special bond with Ms. Matthews (1894-1988), a participant in the suffrage movement of the 1920s who graduated from National University Law School in Washington, D.C., where “On weekends, she picketed the White House,” Justice Ginsburg noted with a smile. No firm in Washington would hire Ms. Matthews, who established a solo practice specializing in eminent domain law, said Justice Ginsburg. In fitting irony, Ms. Matthews bested government lawyers in the 1920s by negotiating $400,000 � an enormous sum for the time � in the sale of a house owned by the National Woman’s Party, demolished to make way for the site on which the Supreme Court now sits. Justice Ginsburg left her CUNY Law admirers with one further subject lesson in the long view of dissent, the words of Mohandas K. Gandhi: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.