X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46933 Justice Targum DEFENDANT PHYSICAL therapist moved for dismissal of plaintiff’s action alleging negligent performance of physical therapy, arguing that plaintiff’s claim was for medical malpractice, rather than negligence, and thus required a certificate of merit pursuant to Civil Practice Law and Rules �3012-a. The court denied dismissal. Guided by CPLR �3012-a(g) the court ordered both parties to provide expert disclosure to the other. Despite observing that Censki v. Madison Avenue Physical Therapy held that physical therapists are not physicians, the court noted that the sole issue was dismissal due to plaintiff’s failure to provide a certificate of merit required in medical malpractice actions. The court determined that dismissal was inappropriate, finding that plaintiff’s pleadings were sufficiently particular to give the court and parties notice of the transactions and occurrences intended to be proved and the material elements of each cause of action.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.