X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46623 Justice Schmidt IN AN INJURY action, plaintiff sought $633,815 in future lost earnings, claiming total disability after falling when an elevator mislevelled. Defendant elevator company moved to compel plaintiff’s examination by a vocational rehabilitation specialist (VRS). Plaintiff argued that examination as improper because he did not use a VRS’s report to support his future lost earnings claim. The court compelled examination, finding that the information obtained would be material and relevant to the defense of plaintiff’s claim. In Freni v. Eastbridge Assocs., the Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the grant of a motion to compel a plaintiff’s examination by a VRS where future lost wages were sought. It found that to do so was consistent with the Court of Appeals’ holding in Kavanagh v. Ogden Allied Maintenance Corp., that Civil Practice Law and Rules �3121(a) does not limit the court’s discretion in supervising discovery under CPLR �3101.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.