Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46514 Justice Demarest ALLEGING WRONGFUL refusal to transfer stock, plaintiff, on her children’s behalf, sought a declaration that as custodian under the Uniform Gift to Minors Act, she was the true owner of the shares. The foreign defendant corporation sought dismissal as not subject to personal jurisdiction under Civil Practice Law and Rules �301 or CPLR �302, the “long-arm statute.” The court denied dismissal. The court noted that the stock certificates at issue stated that they were transferrable in New York City. It found that the corporation implicitly promised to the stockholder that a transfer agent would be available to execute transfer in New York City and, by so promising, had reason to expect suit in New York upon breach. The corporation’s endorsement was a deliberate act by which the corporation conducted activities in New York. Personal jurisdiction under CPLR �302 was established because plaintiff’s cause of action directly related to the transfer of stock.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.