X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Linus G. Farr SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY D-52 September Term 2003 IN THE MATTER OF LINUS G. FARR, a/k/a L. GILBERT FARR, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 015251977) O R D E R The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-322, recommending that LINUS G. FARR, a/k/a L. GILBERT FARR, of MANAHAWKIN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1977, and who thereafter was temporarily suspended from the practice of law by Order of this Court filed October 31, 2000, and who remains suspended at this time, should be disbarred for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.1(b) (pattern of neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4 (failure to communicate), RPC 1.5(a) (unreasonable fee), RPC 1.5(b) (failure to provide written fee agreement), RPC 1.15 (failure to safeguard client property), RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client funds), RPC 1.15(d) (failure to maintain required attorney books and records), RPC 1.16(d) (improper termination of representation), RPC 3.3(a)(5) (failure to disclose material fact to tribunal), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), RPC 8.4(b) (commission of a criminal act that reflects adversely on lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness), RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving fraud, dishonesty, deceit or misrepresentation), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice); And said LINUS G. FARR, a/k/a L. GILBERT FARR, having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause issued in this matter; And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that LINUS G. FARR, a/k/a L. GILBERT FARR, be disbarred, effective immediately; and it is further ORDERED that respondent’s name be stricken from the roll of attorneys and that he be permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys, and it is further ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by LINUS G. FARR, a/k/a L. GILBERT FARR, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 that were restrained from disbursement by Order of the Court filed October 30, 2000, shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter. WITNESS, the Honorable Deborah T. Poritz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 25th day of February, 2004. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT James P. Henry SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY D-75 September Term 2003 IN THE MATTER OF JAMES P. HENRY, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 235231967): O R D E R This matter having been duly presented to the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-10(b) following a motion for discipline by consent of JAMES P. HENRY of ASBURY PARK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1967; And the Office of Attorney Ethics and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping requirements), RPC 1.1(a) (gross negligence), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.15(a)(failure to safeguard client funds) RPC 1.15(b) (failure to properly disburse funds), RPC 1.15(c) (failure to promptly distribute funds to client), RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with ethics authorities), RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving fraud, deceit, dishonesty or misrepresentation); And the parties having agreed that respondent’s conduct violated Rule 1:21-6(c) and RPC 1.1(a), RPC 1.3, RPC 1.15(a), (b), RPC 8.1(b), RPC 8.4(c) and RPC 8.4(d), and that said conduct warrants a three month suspension; And the Disciplinary Review Board having reviewed the record pursuant to Rule 1:20-10(b)(3) to determine the appropriate measure of discipline for respondent’s misconduct; And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a three-month suspension is the appropriate discipline for respondent’s ethics infractions and having granted the motion for discipline by consent; And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20-16(e); And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that JAMES P. HENRY is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective March 22, 2004; and it is further ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter. WITNESS, the Honorable Deborah T. Poritz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 25th day of February, 2004. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT Frank Martino III SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY D-84 September Term 2003 IN THE MATTER OF FRANK MARTINO III, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 008081994) O R D E R The Office of Attorney Ethics having filed a petition with the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20-11, recommending that FRANK MARTINO III, of GIBBSBORO, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1994, be immediately temporarily suspended from the practice of law, and good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that FRANK MARTINO III, is temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until further Order of this Court; and it is further ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by FRANK MARTINO III, pursuant to Rule 1:21-6, and in any fiduciary capacity, shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court, and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending the further Order of the Court; and it is further ORDERED that FRANK MARTINO III be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys. WITNESS, the Honorable Deborah T. Poritz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 25th day of February, 2004. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT Philip J. Moran SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY D-147 September Term 2002 IN THE MATTER OF PHILIP J. MORAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 015061975) O R D E R PHILIP J. MORAN of SKILLMAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1975, and who was transferred to disability inactive status by the Court on September 8, 2003, pending an examination and report by a mental health professional evaluating respondent’s capacity to practice law and to participate in his defense of the ethics proceedings against him; And the Court having considered the report of Daniel P. Greenfield, M.D., and the comments of counsel on the report; And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that the Order of the Court filed on September 8, 2004, placing respondent on disability inactive status and staying the ethics proceedings against respondent is hereby vacated; and it is further ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the District VII Ethics Committee to permit respondent to file an answer to the formal complaint in Docket No.VII-02-10E, which answer shall be filed within thirty days after the filing date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that PHILIP J. MORAN is hereby transferred to active status, provided, however that respondent shall practice law only under the supervision of a practicing attorney approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics, effective immediately and until the further Order of the Court. WITNESS, the Honorable Deborah T. Poritz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 25th day of February, 2004. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT Anthony C. Nwaka SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY D-61 September Term 2003 IN THE MATTER OF ANTHONY C. NWAKA, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 031921991) O R D E R The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-266, concluding that as a matter of reciprocal discipline, ANTHONY C. NWAKA of EAST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, and who has been suspended from the practice of law since August 1, 2003, pursuant to the Order of this Court filed on July 2, 2003, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that ANTHONY C. NWAKA is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective immediately; and it is further ORDERED that respondent continue to be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent continue to comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter. WITNESS, the Honorable Deborah T. Poritz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 25th day of February, 2004. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT Richard P. Schubach SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY D-49 September Term 2003 IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD P. SCHUBACH, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW (Attorney No. 020601983) O R D E R The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-218, concluding that RICHARD P. SCHUBACH of RARITAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1983, should be suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence) and RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate with client); And the Disciplinary Review Board having further concluded that respondent should be required to complete twelve hours of courses in professional responsibility within ninety days after his reinstatement to practice; And good cause appearing; It is ORDERED that RICHARD P. SCHUBACH is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and until the further Order of the Court, effective March 22, 2004; and it is further ORDERED that respondent shall complete twelve hours of courses in professional responsibility approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics within ninety days after reinstatement to practice and submit proof of his successful completion thereof to the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of suspension and that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20; and it is further ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter. WITNESS, the Honorable Deborah T. Poritz, Chief Justice, at Trenton, this 25th day of February, 2004. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.