Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Newark, N.J.�A New Jersey judge, following case law in nine states that allow suits for intentional infliction of emotional distress over injury to an animal, refused last week to dismiss a claim that a horse-transport service and riding stable injured a horse so badly the teenage owner contemplated suicide. Judge Ronald Graves of Sussex County Superior Court said a reasonable jury could find that the carrier’s and the stable’s actions were reckless, extreme and outrageous and that they proximately caused severe harm to the teenager. “From a fairness perspective, there is no logical reason to insulate defendants from liability for the consequences of their conduct,” Graves wrote in Morrisroe v. Moriarty, No. L-600-01. The judge said that allowing the claim to go forward was “compatible with the dual objectives of our tort system: the just compensation of injured parties and the deterrence of future wrongful conduct.” In 2000, when their daughter Jaimie was 12, plaintiffs Lisabeth and Fran Morrisroe, then residing in Indiana, bought Max, a show-quality hunter jumper, for $20,000. Later that year, they moved to Sparta, N.J., and arranged for Horsein’ Around, a Tennessee-based carrier, to move Max to On Course Riding Academy, a boarding stable in Lafayette, N.J. Hurt in jump On arrival, Max allegedly hurt his lower left hind leg when he was forced to jump three feet from the trailer to the ground. During the next year, On Course failed to follow veterinary treatment protocols, overexercised Max, rode him in deep snow, whipped him over jumps and fitted him with wrong-sized horseshoes, according to the Morrisroes. Max wound up chronically lame and had either to be put out to pasture or destroyed. At that point, Jaimie, “said goodbye to her horse and planned her suicide,” the suit alleges. The horse was put out to pasture. Graves based his ruling on the public policy of deterring cruelty to animals, as reflected in statutory law. He referred to legislative bill A-3074, enacted on Jan. 9, which increased criminal and civil penalties for certain animal-cruelty offenses. With no New Jersey case on point, Graves found persuasive case law in nine states, including Pennsylvania and New York, which allowed actions for emotional distress over death or injury to a pet or companion animal. In 2001, the 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held in Brown v. Muhlenberg, 269 F.3d 205, that Pennsylvania would allow an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim against a police officer who shot the plaintiff’s dog after it strayed out of the yard. The closest New Jersey case is Hyland v. Borras, 316 N.J. Super. 22 (1998), in which the state Appellate Division, recognizing the subjective value of a pet’s relationship with a human, allowed the owner of a Shih Tzu worth $500 to recover $2,500 in veterinary expenses from the owner of a bulldog that attacked it. The day after Graves released his opinion, legislators introduced bill A-2411, which would create a civil right of action for loss of companionship and emotional distress against someone convicted under any of five animal cruelty laws. The bill, which has 29 backers, would cap damages for loss of companionship at $20,000.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.