X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46119 Justice Thomas PETITIONER HOMEOWNER challenged a $14,300 fine grounded on a notice of violation for converting her home into single-room occupancies (SROs) in violation of New York City Administrative Code ��27-118.1 and 26-126.1. She argued that the fine was excessive, punitive and arbitrary, and that she had corrected most of the violations prior to a Nov. 9, 1999 hearing. The court denied petitioner’s fine reduction request, concluding that the fine and daily penalty for the six SROs was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be unfair. Despite noting that evidence at the Nov. 9, 1999 hearing established the removal of a cellar kitchen and bathroom and that no one lived in the space, the court found no evidence that the work was performed by a licensed plumber as required by �26-142(a)(1)(a) of the administrative code. The court also noted petitioner’s testimony that three SROs remained occupied by non-family members.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.