X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
http://nycourts.law.com/CourtDocumentViewer.asp?view=Document&docID=46106 Judge Hackeling PLAINTIFF CHECK casher sought $622 on a dishonored check drawn on defendant’s account. Defendant claimed that it promptly notified the police and bank that the forged check had been stolen on Aug. 8, 2003. Relying on CLB Check Cashing Inc. v. Mount Sinai Hospital, plaintiff argued that because it cashed the check in good faith, it was a “holder in due course” under Uniform Commercial Code ��3-301 and 3-302 so that defendant bore the loss. The court dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to the “unauthorized signature” defense in UCC �3-404. Noting that the check was dated Aug. 8, 2004, the court, referring to UCC �3-104, concluded that plaintiff could not be considered to have been a holder in due course until after that date. Noting plaintiff’s failure to verify the check’s authenticity or note its patently defective post-date and failure to bear a corporate office for its signatory, the court ruled that plaintiff failed to establish that it was a “good faith payor.”

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.