Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
For the fifth consecutive year, fewer people have been sentenced to death in the United States, according to a report released Friday by an anti-death penalty group. The Washington, D.C.-based Death Penalty Information Center projects that 139 death sentences will be rendered in 2003. That’s a decline of 13 percent from 2002 and a drop of more than 50 percent over the last five years. California is part of that trend. The number of death sentences has dropped dramatically in the state over the past four years. Statistics from the state Supreme Court show 42 death judgments in 1999 and 21 in 2002. In 2003, death sentences rose slightly to 23. The Death Penalty Information Center’s report compiles annual death judgment informationfrom the Bureau of Justice Statistics. While the bureau won’t release a 2003 figure until next year, Dieter’s group predicts that the final number is likely to show a further drop. Richard Dieter, the information center’s executive director, attributes the decline to increasing public sentiment against the death penalty. He noted that a majority of people back capital punishment �� 64 percent according to the most recent Gallup poll. But that number is lower than the 80 percent approval number Gallup reported in 1994. Also, more juries now have the legal option to sentence defendants to life without parole, he said. “It gives juries a middle ground,” Dieter said. The report also found the number of executions and the number of U.S. inmates on death row decreased in 2003. California has the nation’s largest death row �� with 632 inmates �� followed by Texas and Florida, which have 451 and 381 inmates respectively. Texas continues to lead the country in executions. But Dieter noted that jurors there don’t have the option of sentencing a defendant to life without parole. They must either choose death or a prison term that carries a parole option. Rory Little, a Hastings College of the Law professor who once sat on former Attorney General Janet Reno’s death penalty review committee, said the national and state decline reflects a “cultural hesitancy” about the death penalty. “We, as lawyers, became aware of the actual innocence phenomenon four to five years ago,” Little said, referring to the rash of death row inmates exonerated after their convictions. News about those exonerations have trickled down to “the person on the street,” he said. And people are uneasy about the disproportionate number of minorities sentenced to death. One criminal justice expert who backs the death penalty agreed that anti-death penalty sentiment is growing but said that other factors were at work. “Fatigued” prosecutors don’t seek capital punishment as much as they used to because “they know that the sentences are not going to be carried out,” said Kent Scheidegger, legal director for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation in Sacramento. Court rulings — such as the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Ring v. Arizona–have overturned death sentences in cases that were done by the book, he said. Among other things, Ring held that a jury — not a judge — must decide whether to sentence a defendant to death. The U.S. Supreme Court plans to decide whether that finding is retroactive, potentially affecting the death sentences of more than 100 inmates in the West. Ring did not affect California death sentences. Despite the declining numbers, Scheidegger — who contributed to a California District Attorneys Association white paper defending the death penalty — contends the number of death sentences will rise again. Scientific advances will give prosecutors the tools to assure jurors that the right person will be convicted for the right crime, he said. “The best argument that they have is residual doubt. The more assurance you have,” the less residual doubt there will be, he said.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.