X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
When it comes to death sentences, the Alameda County district attorney’s office had a rough year. Prosecutors pursued five capital cases but only got the death penalty in one. One high-profile defeat came in June when a jury deadlocked on whether to sentence Ruben Vasquez to death for killing a sheriff’s deputy during a 1998 robbery of an Outback Steakhouse in Dublin. Ultimately, 27-year-old Vasquez was sentenced to life without parole. But Alameda is not the only county in California to see a drop in death penalty sentences. The number of death judgmentsdelivered by juries statewide has tumbled to one of the lowest points since the death penalty was reinstated 25 years ago. “The numbers have been down for a few years now,” said Michael Ogul, an assistant public defender in Alameda County who co-chairs the death penalty committee for the California Public Defenders Association. In Alameda County, defense attorneys and prosecutors alike attribute the decline in death sentences to a change in jury attitudes. With DNA evidence exonerating some on death row in Illinois and in other states, they say, juries have become more wary of handing out the verdict. But death penalty experts throughout the state point to other reasons as well. In Los Angeles County, which contributes the largest share of the state’s death judgments, the district attorney has become more selective about pursuing the high-cost cases. In at least one county inexperienced prosecutors are having trouble persuading juries to vote for execution. And one prosecutor chalks the decline up to Three Strikes, citing its success in putting criminals with long rap sheets — the most likely candidates for the death penalty �� behind bars. While the reasons vary, counties statewide are seeing the trend. In 1993, Alameda County prosecutors won death judgments in six of the eight cases pursued compared with this year’s yield of one in five. In conservative Orange County, jurors in 1995 delivered the death penalty in all four of the cases where it was sought. In 2002, Orange County prosecutors again sought death in four cases, but didn’t succeed in a single one. (All of those cases have been or will be retried.) The death penalty has been California law since 1872, but executions were halted from 1967 until 1978 due to numerous challenges in state and federal courts. State lawmakers revised the penalty in 1977 to pass constitutional muster, and voters approved Proposition 7, California’s current death penalty statute, in 1978. The first year, the California Supreme Court received six death sentences. Since then, the number has fluctuated, reaching a high of 46 sentences in 1992. But since 1999 the number has slid. And as of Dec. 16, the court in 2003 had received just 23 death judgments. Although Alameda has a liberal reputation, in the 1990s county juries demonstrated a conservative streak and voted for death more often, said veteran Oakland criminal defense attorney James Giller. “Now the pendulum has swung back the other way.” Assistant District Attorney James Anderson agrees. “A lot of people’s attitudes about death have changed a lot,” said Anderson, a veteran death penalty prosecutor who chairs the California District Attorneys’ Association’s committee on the death penalty. Anderson has witnessed what he calls “creeping doubt” among jurors, who refer specifically in questionnaires to the situation in Illinois where DNA evidence exonerated some inmates and raised questions about that state’s judicial system and its treatment of capital cases. Alameda County leaders weighed in on the national debate earlier this year with a symbolic resolution calling for a death penalty moratorium. Giller says those doubts show up in voir dire , when more prospective jurors in Alameda are saying they could never vote for death in the penalty phase. Meanwhile, he added, more juries are returning life-without-parole verdicts. Ogul, the assistant public defender, says he’s seeing the same thing. “Juries are less likely to vote for the death penalty than they used to be.” In Los Angeles, the numbers have dipped in part because District Attorney Steve Cooley has been more selective in seeking the death penalty since he was elected in 2000. “Three years ago in L.A., you could take a look at cases where they were seeking death and there’d be no rhyme or reason,” said John Brock, who supervises special circumstances cases for the public defender. Before Cooley came into office, L.A. prosecutors seeking death sometimes returned with life sentences — or even outright acquittals. Peter Bozanich, the chair of Cooley’s special circumstances committee, said that since he’s taken over, not a single death jury has voted for life without parole, nor have any returned acquittals or found them guilty on lesser charges. It’s not enough to seek death and let a jury sort out the rest, Bozanich said. He said he carefully weighs a case’s aggravating and mitigating factors. “If I recommend death � a lot of money is involved.” Brock called Bozanich a “hard- nosed” prosecutor who knows the value of a case. “The political change was, in part, because they were not getting the death verdicts,” Brock said. Most death judgments come from Southern California — about 30 percent have come from L.A. alone since 1978. Bay Area counties charge fewer capital cases, and lawyers here say that makes it hard to identify trends. But in the local counties that bring death cases, prosecutors say they’re aware, at least anecdotally, that they’ve got a tougher sell now. Jurors want stronger evidence of guilt, said Contra Costa County DA Bob Kochly. “People want to be more sure, more so than in the past,” he said. Lane Liroff, a Santa Clara County deputy DA who tries capital cases, says juror doubts about the death penalty can actually give prosecutors a tactical advantage. Unlike jurors who are uncertain about their position on the death penalty, opponents to it are now less likely to “fly under the radar” during jury selection and favor the defense in jury deliberations, Liroff said. Orange County, long a death penalty stronghold, is also trying fewer death penalty cases. At one time there were as many as 17 capital cases in the pipeline, said prosecutor Lewis Rosenblum. Complicating the picture, the office this year has been rocked by political scandals, attorney departures and an attorney general inquiry. However, Rosenblum says that the drop in death penalty convictions in his county has more to do with prosecutorial experience. When Orange County DA Tony Rackauckas was elected in 1998, he promoted several veteran capital case prosecutors to supervisory posts, said Rosenblum, one of the promoted lawyers. “There are brand new people trying their first cases,” he said. Though prosecutors failed to get death judgments in four tries last year, in 2003 they’ve won the death sentence in two of three penalty phases, Rosenblum said. In Riverside County ,Chief Deputy District Attorney Kevin Ruddy says Three Strikes has reduced the number of death penalty cases in his county. Historically, many of the county’s capital cases involved robbery-murders committed by defendants with rap sheets “as long as your arm,” Ruddy said. Since California voters passed the Three Strikes law in 1994, there are fewer special circumstance defendants with similar criminal histories. “We don’t get those anymore,” Ruddy said. A San Diego defense attorney thinks confusion over the meaning of life without parole has contributed to the drop in death sentences. In the 1990s, jurors reported that they voted for death because they thought that there was a chance the defendant could get paroled if the jury voted for a life sentence, said Barton Sheela III, a San Diego County alternate public defender who has tried death penalty cases. Now jurors know that “life without parole” means exactly that, Sheela said. “Jurors realize that they don’t have to lean that far.” Because death penalty cases can take years to go to trial, some prosecutors and defense attorneys cautioned against reading the recent decline as a permanent one. Every jury is different, said Jeff Dusek, a San Diego deputy DA who has been trying death cases since 1988, and so is every case. “When a jury gets a death penalty case, they are not distracted by anything in the community but that case,” he said. Death penalty cases are “too complicated,” to analyze in that way, said Rosenblum, the Orange County prosecutor. “If you get the right prosecutor with the right case,” he said, “you will get the right result.” Anderson, the Alameda prosecutor, thinks the number of death verdicts will rise again. He predicts that scientific and legal developments �� such as court decisions that back the admissibility of mitochondrial DNA �� will help ease jurors’ fears about sentencing the wrong person to death. And he says that even in liberal counties there will always be crimes that prompt jurors to vote for death. “We are a liberal county,” Anderson said. “But if you mess with kids it’s over.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.