Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The city Ethics Commission on Friday lifted the voluntary spending cap on candidates in the race for San Francisco district attorney. One of the candidates, Kamala Harris, has already spent $302,505 — far exceeding the $211,000 limit. On Thursday, Harris filed a pair of documents with the commission: one saying she rejected the cap; the other noting that she had raised and spent more than the limit for the Nov. 4 election. Representatives for Harris’ opponents — Bill Fazio and incumbent Terence Hallinan — cried foul, saying she had earlier filed a statement accepting the spending caps. After a candidate accepts a voluntary spending cap, they face possible penalties under city campaign finance laws if they break them. Representatives for Fazio and Hallinan said Harris is either breaking the rules or looking for loopholes to get around them. It’s not clear, however, if Harris faces administrative, civil or criminal penalties. “The charter prohibits us from confirming or denying the existence of an enforcement matter,” said Mabel Ng, the commission’s deputy executive director. Under the city’s campaign finance law, the commission must lift the spending limit when it receives notice that a candidate who has declined to abide by the cap has spent more than the limit, a statement by the commission said. The commission’s statement also notes that Harris filed a notice in January with the Department of Elections to accept the voluntary spending limit. As a result, the voter information pamphlet for Nov. 4 that’s already on the department’s Web site says Harris agreed to voluntarily limit her spending. Harris’ campaign said there was a misunderstanding about the requirements due to amendments made to the city’s campaign finance law in July. According to campaign finance statements filed Thursday, Harris raised $348,281 from July 1, 2002, through Sept. 20. During the same period, Hallinan raised $108,186 and spent $105,989. Fazio pulled down $177,418 and spent $105,381.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.