Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
San Francisco-The real world of property laws and liability applies to the virtual world of the Internet, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. A three-judge panel ruled unanimously on July 25 that Network Solutions Inc. can be held liable for handing over ownership of the lucrative sex.com domain name-which Internet entrepreneur Gary Kremen claimed was his property-to ex-con Stephen Cohen, a fugitive who once proclaimed himself the king of online smut. “Negligent or not, it was Network Solutions that gave away Kremen’s property. Kremen never did anything,” Judge Alex Kozinski wrote. “It would not be unfair to hold Network Solutions responsible and force it to try to recoup its losses by chasing down Cohen. This, at any rate, is the logic of the common law, and we do not lightly discard it.” Joining Kozinski in Kremen v. Cohen, No. 03 C.D.O.S. 6565, were Judge M. Margaret McKeown and U.S. District Judge James Fitzgerald, sitting by designation. The source of the dispute Cohen and Kremen were on a collision course from the day Cohen sent a forged letter to Network Solutions (now VeriSign Inc.)-which at the time was the exclusive “postmaster” of Internet addresses-asking the company to reassign the rights to the domain to Cohen. “Despite the letter’s transparent claim that a company called ‘Online Classifieds’ had no Internet connection, Network Solutions made no effort to contact Kremen,” Kozinski wrote. Kremen never developed sex.com. Cohen, aided by a growing interest in online pornography, turned it into a popular-and lucrative-Internet destination. Kremen sued Cohen and Network Solutions in U.S. district court in San Jose, Calif. District Judge James Ware sided with Kremen, ruling that Cohen owes him $65 million in compensatory and punitive damages. Though Kremen received Cohen’s expensive Rancho Santa Fe, Calif., home, he hasn’t received any money. The profits from sex.com are believed to be in an offshore account, while Cohen’s exact whereabouts are unknown-he fled while the case was pending. Kremen’s lawyers had argued that Network Solutions had committed the tort of conversion. Network Solutions had said the tort required the transferring of tangible property, saying the domain name didn’t qualify. “I think the case is very significant,” said Kremen’s lawyer, James Wagstaffe of San Francisco’s Kerr & Wagstaffe. “It is maybe the first case that applies traditional property law to the Internet.” Ware dismissed the case against Network Solutions, saying its role was “purely ministerial” and that holding it liable could impede the growth of the Internet. The 9th Circuit decision was hailed by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the online rights advocacy group. “The Internet is a gigantic engine of democracy and free speech for many people, and now that engine, basically, has a warranty,” foundation staff attorney Jason Schultz said. Kremen did not have to pay for registering sex.com, so the panel denied his claim that Network Solutions was guilty of a breach of contract. But registrants now must pay to maintain domain names, seemingly making that portion of the ruling obsolete. Schultz said the long-term implications of the case, if any, are not clear. Domain registration is handled by several companies, most of which require contracts barring legal action by domain holders. “One thing I would definitely encourage people to do is read those contracts,” Schultz said. For Wagstaffe, winning on conversion grounds is important-contract law doesn’t support punitive damages, while the tort of conversion does. Wagstaffe said Ware will have to decide whether Network Solutions can be assessed the $25 million in punitive damages levied on Cohen. Last year, a San Francisco Bar Association panel of arbitrators voided a purported agreement between Kremen and a lawyer he hired early on in the case. The agreement would have entitled the lawyer to 15% of the judgment.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.