Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
in an 8-1 decision, the justices affirmed a Virginia Supreme Court ruling that held the state law making cross-burning with intent to intimidate a criminal offense is unconstitutional because the statute contains a provision that the simple act of burning the cross is prima facie proof of intent to intimidate. Virginia v. Black, No. 01-1107. The justices held, however, that cross-burning with intent is not protected by the First Amendment and may be banned by state law. The court vacated and remanded the sentences of the defendants who were convicted by courts that gave the prima facie evidence provision as a jury instruction, explaining that the provision makes it more likely than not that a jury will find that a defendant had burned the cross with intent to intimidate, whether that intent was there or not. O’Connor delivered the court’s opinion. Thomas filed a dissenting opinion.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Reprints & Licensing
Mentioned in a Law.com story?

License our industry-leading legal content to extend your thought leadership and build your brand.


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.