Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
in a 7-2 decision, the justices vacated a decision by the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Columbia upholding a National Park Service regulation that purports to render the Contract Disputes Act, which established rules governing disputes arising out of certain government contracts, inapplicable to concession contracts. National Park Hospitality Association v. Department of the Interior, No. 02-196. The court remanded the case on the ground that the controversy was not ripe for judicial resolution because mere uncertainty as to the validity of a rule does not constitute a hardship for purposes of the ripeness analysis. Thomas’ opinion was joined by Rehnquist, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg and Stevens. Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, in which O’Connor joined.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.