X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
PLAINTIFF, A hip hop disc jockey, alleged, among other things, that defendant, a rival disc jockey at a competing radio station, had physically attacked and defamed her in retaliation for an interview in which her guest claimed that defendant had accepted bribes to play certain songs. The court denied defendant’s dismissal motion and combined plaintiff’s claims with others – against the radio station that employed defendant and that station’s corporate parent – contending that they were vicariously liable for defendant’s assault and negligent in hiring and supervising defendant. The court dismissed plaintiff’s cause of action for slander, finding that even if defendant had made certain allegedly insulting statements that can normally be understood to impute plaintiff’s chastity, the context of defendant’s alleged assault on plaintiff rendered those statements as hyperbole or epithets that are exempt from action as slander. Read full-text

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.