Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
american lawyer media news service Albany, n.y.-A Manhattan girl who skipped high school, went straight to college and earned a 3.8 grade point average can’t get her associate degree because she doesn’t have a high school diploma, and she can’t get one of those because she’s too young. Angela Lipsman’s dilemma is of her own making and that of her defiant father, and not the result of constitutional deprivation or age discrimination, a New York state court trial judge has ruled. “Instead of following state law upon the issue of school attendance they chose to chart their own education course for Angela and now must deal with the annoying result of that decision,” Supreme Court Justice Bernard J. Malone Jr. said. The unusual case involves a child prodigy who took her first college course at age 11 and, after finishing eighth grade at PS 187 in Washington Heights, N.Y., and passing two high school regents exams, opted for college. Lipsman, 15, has met every requirement necessary to graduate from the Borough of Manhattan Community College, except one. She does not have a high school equivalency diploma. New York law requires children to remain in school until they are 16, and it will not award an equivalency diploma to someone under 17. Catch-22 Justice Malone said Lipsman, who has completed 33 college courses and accumulated 71 credits, could have avoided this Catch-22 by remaining in public school and pursuing her high school studies at an accelerated pace. Additionally, he said she could have been home-schooled on a fast track. Lipsman’s father is a retired teacher. Yet she bypassed high school altogether in violation of the law. “Angela was not legally free to ‘skip’ high school,” Malone wrote in Lipsman v. New York State Education Department, No. 102527/03. The case arose when Lipsman was advised that she would not be awarded her associate’s degree without certifying that she had a high school diploma. After she was denied a high school equivalency diploma, her father, Daniel Lipsman, brought a pro se action alleging age discrimination. Malone dismissed the claim. He said the state clearly has a compelling interest advanced by compulsory school attendance for youths between the ages of 6 and 16, and the bar on granting a equivalency degree to those younger than 17 is related to that public policy objective. “I am not too thrilled,” Angela Lipsman said in an interview. “I just don’t think it is fair.”

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.