X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
DISBARMENT The following persons have been disbarred by the California Supreme Court, effective on the dates indicated. They are ineligible to practice law, and their names have been stricken from the roster of California attorneys. They must comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of the Court. John Forrest Franklin II, Reseda, May 24 Michael Dale Hargrove, Grand Terrace, May 24 Norman Alter Wessel, Kailua Kona, Hawaii, May 16 Connie Ray Zakrajsek, Tempe, Ariz., May 28 RESIGNATION WITH CHARGES PENDING The following persons have resigned as members of the State Bar of California. They are ineligible to practice law in the state of California, effective on the dates indicated. Dale John Peroutka, Anaheim, May 28 Wayne Roger Rasmussen, Watertown, Tenn., May 28 Gary Keith Ravet, La Jolla, May 28 C. Brian Smith, Los Angeles, May 24 RESIGNATION WITH NO CHARGES PENDING The following persons have resigned as members of the California State Bar and their resignations have been accepted by the California Supreme Court. They are ineligible to practice law in the state of California, effective on the dates indicated. Maria Claire Angeletti, Encinitas, May 15 David Bonbright, London, England, Aug. 25, 2002 Mary Valentine Carver, San Marino, May 15 Susan Benson Collins, Martin, Tenn., May 15 Kathleen Diane Drake, Edina, Minn., May 15 Richard John Hill, Anaheim, May 15 James Alan Huffman, Pagosa Springs, Colo., May 15 Daniel Francis Hughes, Grants Pass, Ore., May 15 Linda Faye Levine, Stanford, May 15 Roger James Metzler Jr., Walnut Creek, May 15 Grant E. Propper, Encino, May 15 Terry Ann Rogers, Portland, Ore., May 28 Donald Richard Rudolf II, Valley Center, May 15 Lawrence Milo Sands, Cardiff, May 15 Ann Lee Schlaak, Richmond, May 15 Robert Selvidge, Mill Valley, May 28 Terence Bradley Smith, Sacramento, May 15 Gail Ellen Strosberg, Farmington Hills, Mich., May 15 Gerard E. Traumueller, Laguna Hills, May 15 SUSPENSION The following persons have been suspended by the California Supreme Court, effective on the dates indicated. Unless otherwise noted, they are required to pass the professional responsibility exam specified in the court order and to comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of Court: Scott Raymond Merrill, Davis — May 16: Suspended for two years and until restitution and until he takes and passes the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination and until shows proof of rehabilitation, fitness to practice, and learning and ability in the general law and until State Bar Court grants motion to terminate suspension. #Karl Frederick Munz, Sacramento — May 24: Suspended for one year and until shows proof of rehabilitation, fitness to practice, and learning and ability in the general law. Michael Scott Newcomer, Sacramento — May 16: Suspended for 30 days and until State Bar Court grants motion to terminate suspension. If the period of actual suspension is two years or greater, remain suspended until shows proof of rehabilitation, fitness to practice, and learning and ability in the general law. Terrell D. Powell, Los Angeles — May 16: Suspended for six months. Two years’ probation with conditions. #Allan Joel Sarkin, Encino — May 28: Suspended for 30 days. One year of probation with conditions. Eric Monroe St. John, Huntington Beach — May 28: Suspended for 120 days. Two years’ probation with conditions. Must make restitution. #Paul Seiichi Sugino, Santa Barbara — May 16: Suspended for 30 days and until State Bar Court grants motion to terminate suspension. If the period of actual suspension is two years or greater, remain suspended until shows proof of rehabilitation, fitness to practice, and learning and ability in the general law. # Not required to comply with Rule 955 of the California Rules of the Court

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]

 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.