Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
The judge presiding over the latest blockbuster challenge to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act said May 15 she was “substantially persuaded” by a pair of rulings that sided with copyright holders in upholding the law. Judge Susan Illston of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California sounded ready to allow a group of film studios to use the controversial law to stop 321 Studios’ distribution of software that allows users to make copies of encrypted DVDs. Although it appears a happy ending is in store for Hollywood studios, Illston did toss in a couple of plot twists during arguments on summary judgment. 321 Studios v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, No. 02-1955, centers on two programs — DVD X-Copy and DVD Copy Plus — that crack the encryption on DVDs in order for copies to be made. But the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, passed in 1998, forbids the circumvention of encryption measures designed to protect digital works. 321 Studios says its software is intended to allow DVD owners to make backup copies for personal use and argues that it is a fair use that Hollywood can’t prevent. “Under the studios’ interpretation of the DMCA, there are no fair use rights of digital works at all,” said Keker & Van Nest San Francisco partner Daralyn Durie during arguments. Film studios say the software enables piracy by allowing users to put movies on the Internet. Throughout the hearing, Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp partner Russell Frackman repeatedly referred to St. Louis-based 321 Studios as illegal “traffickers.” One of the cases Illston sees as persuasive was written by her colleague U.S. District Judge Ronald Whyte. In a case involving software that unlocks encryption on Adobe Systems Inc.’s e-Books, Whyte rejected a fair use challenge to the DMCA. Although Illston was throwing few lifelines to 321 Studios, two things happened that may help opponents of the much-criticized law, the primary weapon creative industries are using to protect their digital works. First, Illston stumped a government lawyer appearing with the studios, and, second, she asked about Roger Ebert. Illston asked Department of Justice lawyer John Zacharia how, once a copyright expires, a work would ever enter the public domain if studios continued to produce encrypted copies. Zacharia didn’t have a good answer. She also asked Frackman about a free speech argument Durie advanced. “What about Siskel and Ebert?” she asked. If a studio refuses to cooperate, how could a movie reviewer include a clip? Frackman said, “Fair use is not a constitutional right. It never has been a constitutional right.” Frackman also argued that works protected by the DMCA aren’t subject to the copyright exceptions carved out in 1984′s Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417, which upheld the legality of VCRs because of their substantial, noninfringing uses. Cindy Cohn, legal director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, expressed concern after the hearing that the studios would shift all creative works toward the digital medium — which, under Frackman’s theory, could mean there would be no fair use rights. Durie argued as much during her argument, saying the studios are releasing fewer films on video. “Plenty of content is released only in DVD format and protected by CSS,” she said. But Frackman said 321 Studios is taking the fair use argument too far. “Under no doctrine of copyright law is the user entitled to make extra copies,” Frackman said. This article was distributed by the American Lawyer Media News Service. Jason Hoppin is a reporter at The Recorder in San Francisco.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.