Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
When should corporate and government records be made public, and when should they be kept confidential? Meredith Fuchs knows how to argue both sides. As an Internet and e-commerce partner at Washington, D.C.’s Wiley Rein & Fielding, she aggressively defended the privacy claims of her corporate clients. But since becoming GC of the National Security Archive in December 2002, she’s turned into a champion for total access to government records. In its 18-year history, the Archive has amassed the largest collection in the world of declassified U.S. government documents. But the D.C.-based organization has found its job getting tougher as agencies use post-9/11 concerns to drag their feet on information requests. Fuchs spoke to assistant editor Heather Smith about her career reversal and her current efforts to spread the public access gospel. Corporate Counsel: What is the main difference between your private practice and the Archive? Meredith Fuchs: [At Wiley] I was always looking for a way to advance my clients’ commercial interests and to minimize any negative impact, [so at times] their business interests may require them to settle a case just to have the case done with. . . . [At the Archive,] our legal agenda is mission-driven. . . . So if we bring a lawsuit, we’re not going to settle it by compromising any basic principles regarding access to government information. CC: Do you have any sympathy for a government right to privacy? MF: No. We live in a democracy, [and] we have a right to know what our government is doing. . . . There certainly are circumstances when national security might provide a reason for the government to withhold information, [but] I want the people who make the decision about what is harmful to our national security to closely look at it before they decide to withhold information. CC: What do you say when agencies claim that outdated technology prevents document retrieval? MF: I don’t think it’s a valid excuse at all. . . . If they can’t find documents in order to respond to a FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] request, what does that say about their ability to find the documents to do the work that they’re supposed to do? . . . The only conclusion that you can draw from that [excuse] is that the agencies are using record keeping as a way to avoid seriously searching for the documents. CC: How successful are the Archive’s FOIA requests? MF: In our 18-year history, we’ve made over 2,100 FOIA requests, [and] we’re probably on average more successful than your average Joe. . . . To the extent we do have to litigate [requests], the litigation along the way often creates what in our minds is really a victory. . . . One example of that [is] related to the Iran rescue mission in 1980. . . . We requested information about the mission, and the Department of Defense said that all [documents] were secret. [But] over the course of the suit, 9,000 of the almost 12,000 pages were released to us. CC: How much harder is it to get access now? MF: We don’t have enough post9/11 history yet to really assess whether there has been an impact on the way the courts deal with FOIA requests. . . . There may be changes in the way the agencies handle requests, and that’s something we’re trying right now to assesswhether the guidance that’s been given to the agencies by the attorney general and the White House has any impact on what’s actually being released. One thing we have seen is that the government appears to be trying to use measures like [search fees] to control the number of FOIA requests that they have to respond to. CC: How would you improve the FOIA process? MF: We would like to see the FOIA have an even broader recognition of public interest and disclosure, and the possibility that the public interest can override identified harms. [And] there’s really not much penalty in our law for noncompliance by government agencies. Delays are persistent problems, and you can bring a lawsuit, but there’s not a whole lot else you can do. CC: Have you ever submitted a FOIA request for your own files? MF: I have not, actually, [but] an official from the Justice Department . . . assured me that the making of a request does not in and of itself lead to the creation of an FBI file on you. So I’m thinking about it.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]


ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.